Literature DB >> 11233866

Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.

J Ringash1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A previous review by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination (now the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care) in 1994 indicated fair evidence to exclude mammographic breast cancer screening of women aged 40-49 from the periodic health examination. This current review considers the available new and updated evidence regarding the effect of screening mammography on breast cancer mortality among women in this age group at average risk of breast cancer. OPTIONS: Screening mammography starting at either age 40 or age 50. OUTCOME: Reduction in breast cancer mortality. EVIDENCE: The MEDLINE and CANCERLIT databases were searched for relevant articles published from 1966 to January 2000. Of 68 references obtained, at least 22 were published after the 1994 review. To date, the only trial designed to assess the mortality benefits of screening mammography among women aged 40-49 did not have adequate power to exclude a clinically significant benefit. Other results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are post-hoc subgroup analyses of larger trials. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Screening mammography offers the potential for significant benefits in addition to mortality reduction, including early diagnosis, less aggressive therapy and improved cosmetic results. However, the risks of screening include increased biopsy rates and the psychological effects of false reassurance or false-positive results. Although several of the trials reviewed constitute level I evidence (RCT), at present their conflicting results, methodologic differences and, most important, uncertainty about the risk:benefit ratio of screening precludes the assignment of a "good" or "fair" rating to recommendations drawn from them. VALUES: The strength of evidence was evaluated using the methods of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. A high value was placed on changes in survival. When evidence was available, value was also placed on potential quality-of-life implications. RECOMMENDATION: Current evidence regarding the effectiveness of screening mammography does not suggest the inclusion of the manoeuvre in, or its exclusion from, the periodic health examination of women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer (grade C recommendation). Upon reaching the age of 40, Canadian women should be informed of the potential benefits and risks of screening mammography and assisted in deciding at what age they wish to initiate the manoeuvre. VALIDATION: The findings of this analysis were reviewed through an iterative process by the members of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. SPONSORS: The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care is funded through a partnership between the Provincial and Territorial Ministries of Health and Health Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11233866      PMCID: PMC80774     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  71 in total

1.  Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Kerlikowske; D Grady; S M Rubin; C Sandrock; V L Ernster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-11       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  UICC meeting on breast-cancer screening in pre-menopausal women in developed countries.

Authors:  S Eckhardt; F Badellino; G P Murphy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  British trial aims to settle mammography questions.

Authors:  T Reynolds
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study. An appraisal and implications for early detection policy.

Authors:  C J Mettlin; C R Smart
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  A different view on what is known about breast screening and the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

Authors:  C J Baines
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Statistical power in breast cancer screening trials and mortality reduction among women 40-49 years of age with particular emphasis on the National Breast Screening Study of Canada.

Authors:  D B Kopans; E Halpern; C A Hulka
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.

Authors:  A B Miller; C J Baines; T To; C Wall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  L Tabàr; G Fagerberg; S W Duffy; N E Day; A Gad; O Gröntoft
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  The excess of patients with advanced breast cancer in young women screened with mammography in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

Authors:  R E Tarone
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  The Edinburgh randomised trial of breast cancer screening: results after 10 years of follow-up.

Authors:  F E Alexander; T J Anderson; H K Brown; A P Forrest; W Hepburn; A E Kirkpatrick; C McDonald; B B Muir; R J Prescott; S M Shepherd
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  31 in total

1.  Evidence to action: a tailored multifaceted approach to changing family physician practice patterns and improving preventive care.

Authors:  J Lemelin; W Hogg; N Baskerville
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-03-20       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Screening mammography for women aged 40-49: are we off the fence yet?

Authors:  M B Barton
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Mammography screening among women aged 40-49 years shows no benefit.

Authors:  John Hoey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in average-risk women aged 40-74 years.

Authors:  Marcello Tonelli; Sarah Connor Gorber; Michel Joffres; James Dickinson; Harminder Singh; Gabriela Lewin; Richard Birtwhistle; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Nicole Hodgson; Donna Ciliska; Mary Gauld; Yan Yun Liu
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Should women 40 to 49 years of age be offered mammographic screening?

Authors:  Isabelle Trop; Wilber Deck
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Randomized trial of an intervention to improve mammography utilization among a triracial rural population of women.

Authors:  Electra Paskett; Cathy Tatum; Julia Rushing; Robert Michielutte; Ronny Bell; Kristie Long Foley; Marisa Bittoni; Stephanie L Dickinson; Ann Scheck McAlearney; Katherine Reeves
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Applying the 2011 Canadian guidelines for breast cancer screening in practice.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Ruth Heisey; June C Carroll
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Physicians' attitudes and behaviour toward screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.

Authors:  Patricia Smith; Susan Hum; Vered Kakzanov; M Elisabeth Del Giudice; Ruth Heisey
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2007-01-01

10.  Determining use of preventive health care in Ontario: comparison of rates of 3 maneuvers in administrative and survey data.

Authors:  Li Wang; X Nie Jason; Ross E G Upshur
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.