OBJECTIVES: Questions exist about using mass mailings to recruit representative samples to participate in clinical trials. The MESA Prevention Study (Medical, Epidemiologic and Social Aspects of Aging), a randomized controlled clinical trial to prevent urinary incontinence (UI), utilized a mass mailing recruitment procedure to recruit a representative sample of women to participate in a behavioral modification program. This paper seeks to expand the literature of mass mailing recruitment strategies for prevention studies by describing the procedures used to recruit healthy, continent, post-menopausal women aged 55-80 years. METHODS: Sociodemographic data collected from recruited subjects is compared with on-line national census data to evaluate the representativeness of the sample recruited from a purchased mailing list. RESULTS: The mass mailing procedure resulted in 3.3% positive response. Of those that returned a positive response, 37.6% were deemed eligible at first screening. Comparisons of study demographic data with state and county census data indicate that the sample obtained was representative of the communities. CONCLUSIONS: The mass mailing strategy was an effective means of recruiting a representative sample of women, aged 55-80. Short falls and recommendations for successful community sample recruitment strategies for clinical trials in older adult women are elaborated upon.
OBJECTIVES: Questions exist about using mass mailings to recruit representative samples to participate in clinical trials. The MESA Prevention Study (Medical, Epidemiologic and Social Aspects of Aging), a randomized controlled clinical trial to prevent urinary incontinence (UI), utilized a mass mailing recruitment procedure to recruit a representative sample of women to participate in a behavioral modification program. This paper seeks to expand the literature of mass mailing recruitment strategies for prevention studies by describing the procedures used to recruit healthy, continent, post-menopausal women aged 55-80 years. METHODS: Sociodemographic data collected from recruited subjects is compared with on-line national census data to evaluate the representativeness of the sample recruited from a purchased mailing list. RESULTS: The mass mailing procedure resulted in 3.3% positive response. Of those that returned a positive response, 37.6% were deemed eligible at first screening. Comparisons of study demographic data with state and county census data indicate that the sample obtained was representative of the communities. CONCLUSIONS: The mass mailing strategy was an effective means of recruiting a representative sample of women, aged 55-80. Short falls and recommendations for successful community sample recruitment strategies for clinical trials in older adult women are elaborated upon.
Authors: H Petrovitch; R Byington; G Bailey; P Borhani; S Carmody; L Goodwin; J Harrington; H A Johnson; P Johnson; M Jones Journal: Hypertension Date: 1991-03 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: S Folmar; F Oates-Williams; P Sharp; D Reboussin; J Smith; K Cheshire; J Macer; K Potvin Klein; D Herrington Journal: Control Clin Trials Date: 2001-02
Authors: Mona N Fouad; Giselle Corbie-Smith; David Curb; Barbara V Howard; Charles Mouton; Michael Simon; Greg Talavera; Joanice Thompson; Ching-Yun Wang; Cornelia White; Rosalie Young Journal: Control Clin Trials Date: 2004-08
Authors: Ananias C Diokno; Diane K Newman; Lisa K Low; Tomas L Griebling; Michael E Maddens; Patricia S Goode; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Leslee L Subak; Carolyn M Sampselle; Judith A Boura; Ann E Robinson; Donna McIntyre; Kathryn L Burgio Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: P Daniel Patterson; Cheryl B Jones; Michael W Hubble; Matthew Carr; Matthew D Weaver; John Engberg; Nicholas Castle Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2010 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Siu Ping Chin Feman; Long T Nguyen; Mary T Quilty; Catherine E Kerr; Bong Hyun Nam; Lisa A Conboy; Joyce P Singer; Min Park; Anthony J Lembo; Ted J Kaptchuk; Roger B Davis Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2007-09-07 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Christopher Harkins; Rebecca Shaw; Michelle Gillies; Heather Sloan; Kate Macintyre; Anne Scoular; Caroline Morrison; Fiona Mackay; Heather Cunningham; Paul Docherty; Paul Macintyre; Iain N Findlay Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-07-02 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: K Pun; C W Zhu; M T Kinsella; M Sewell; H Grossman; J Neugroschl; C Li; A Ardolino; N Velasco; M Sano Journal: J Prev Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021