Literature DB >> 11717379

Cochlear and neural delays for coincidence detection in owls.

J L Pena1, S Viete, K Funabiki, K Saberi, M Konishi.   

Abstract

The auditory system uses delay lines and coincidence detection to measure the interaural time difference (ITD). Both axons and the cochlea could provide such delays. The stereausis theory assumes that differences in wave propagation time along the basilar membrane can provide the necessary delays, if the coincidence detectors receive input from fibers innervating different loci on the left and right basilar membranes. If this hypothesis were true, the left and right inputs to coincidence detectors should differ in their frequency tuning. The owl's nucleus laminaris contains coincidence detector neurons that receive input from the left and right cochlear nuclei. Monaural frequency-tuning curves of nucleus laminaris neurons showed small interaural differences. In addition, their preferred ITDs were not correlated with the interaural frequency mismatches. Instead, the preferred ITD of the neuron agrees with that predicted from the distribution of axonal delays. Thus, there is no need to invoke mechanisms other than neural delays to explain the detection of ITDs by the barn owl's laminaris neurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11717379      PMCID: PMC6763915     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  17 in total

1.  Localization by interaural time difference (ITD): effects of interaural frequency mismatch.

Authors:  B H Bonham; E R Lewis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Interaural time sensitivity in medial superior olive of cat.

Authors:  T C Yin; J C Chan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A place theory of sound localization.

Authors:  L A JEFFRESS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1948-02

4.  Effects of interaural intensity difference on the processing of interaural time difference in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  S Viete; J L Peña; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Temporal coding of resonances by low-frequency auditory nerve fibers: single-fiber responses and a population model.

Authors:  L H Carney; T C Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Coincidence detection by binaural neurons in the chick brain stem.

Authors:  A W Joseph; R L Hyson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl.

Authors:  W E Sullivan; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl.

Authors:  C E Carr; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Frequency tuning and spontaneous activity in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus magnocellularis of the barn owl Tyto alba.

Authors:  C Köppl
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Axonal delay lines for time measurement in the owl's brainstem.

Authors:  C E Carr; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  29 in total

1.  Modeling coincidence detection in nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Victor Grau-Serrat; Catherine E Carr; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2003-11-28       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  From postsynaptic potentials to spikes in the genesis of auditory spatial receptive fields.

Authors:  Jose Luis Pena; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Design parameters of the fan-out phase of sensory systems.

Authors:  Marta García-Sanchez; Ramón Huerta
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Effect of instantaneous frequency glides on interaural time difference processing by auditory coincidence detectors.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Louisa J Steinberg; Bertrand Fontaine; Romain Brette; Jose L Peña
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Maps of interaural delay in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Sahil Shah; Thomas McColgan; Go Ashida; Paula T Kuokkanen; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Binaural and cochlear disparities.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Bram Van de Sande; Dries H Louage; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Comparison of midbrain and thalamic space-specific neurons in barn owls.

Authors:  María Lucía Pérez; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Noise reduction of coincidence detector output by the inferior colliculus of the barn owl.

Authors:  G Björn Christianson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Preservation of spectrotemporal tuning between the nucleus laminaris and the inferior colliculus of the barn owl.

Authors:  G Björn Christianson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Vibrio harveyi quorum sensing: a coincidence detector for two autoinducers controls gene expression.

Authors:  Kenny C Mok; Ned S Wingreen; Bonnie L Bassler
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.