Literature DB >> 12612008

Computational diversity in the cochlear nucleus angularis of the barn owl.

Christine Köppl1, Catherine E Carr.   

Abstract

The cochlear nucleus angularis (NA) is widely assumed to form the starting point of a brain stem pathway for processing sound intensity in birds. Details of its function are unclear, however, and its evolutionary origin and relationship to the mammalian cochlear-nucleus complex are obscure. We have carried out extracellular single-unit recordings in the NA of ketamine-anesthetized barn owls. The aim was to re-evaluate the extent of heterogeneity in NA physiology because recent studies of cellular morphology had established several distinct types. Extensive characterization, using tuning curves, phase locking, peristimulus time histograms and rate-level functions for pure tones and noise, revealed five major response types. The most common one was a primary-like pattern that was distinguished from auditory-nerve fibers by showing lower vector strengths of phase locking and/or lower spontaneous rates. Two types of chopper responses were found (chopper-transient and a rare chopper-sustained), as well as onset units. Finally, we routinely encountered a complex response type with a pronounced inhibitory component, similar to the mammalian typeIV. Evidence is presented that this range of response types is representative for birds and that earlier conflicting reports may be due to methodological differences. All five response types defined were similar to well-known types in the mammalian cochlear nucleus. This suggests convergent evolution of neurons specialized for encoding different behaviorally relevant features of the auditory stimulus. It remains to be investigated whether the different response types correlate with morphological types and whether they establish different processing streams in the auditory brain stem of birds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12612008      PMCID: PMC3259745          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00635.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  42 in total

Review 1.  The role of timing in the brain stem auditory nuclei of vertebrates.

Authors:  D Oertel
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 19.318

Review 2.  Synaptic mechanisms for coding timing in auditory neurons.

Authors:  L O Trussell
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 19.318

3.  The superior olivary nucleus and its influence on nucleus laminaris: a source of inhibitory feedback for coincidence detection in the avian auditory brainstem.

Authors:  L Yang; P Monsivais; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neurons selective for orientation and binocular disparity in the visual Wulst of the barn owl (Tyto alba).

Authors:  J D Pettigrew; M Konishi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-08-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A neural map of interaural intensity differences in the brain stem of the barn owl.

Authors:  G A Manley; C Köppl; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Regularity and latency of units in ventral cochlear nucleus: implications for unit classification and generation of response properties.

Authors:  E D Young; J M Robert; W P Shofner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Unit responses from the nucleus angularis in the pigeon's medulla.

Authors:  T Hotta
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1971-10

8.  Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl.

Authors:  W E Sullivan; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Encoding timing and intensity in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the cat.

Authors:  W S Rhode; P H Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Classification of response patterns in cochlear nucleus of barn owl: correlation with functional response properties.

Authors:  W E Sullivan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  29 in total

1.  A role for short-term synaptic facilitation and depression in the processing of intensity information in the auditory brain stem.

Authors:  K M MacLeod; T K Horiuchi; C E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Sound-intensity-dependent compensation for the small interaural time difference cue for sound source localization.

Authors:  Eri Nishino; Rei Yamada; Hiroshi Kuba; Hiroyuki Hioki; Takahiro Furuta; Takeshi Kaneko; Harunori Ohmori
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Beyond timing in the auditory brainstem: intensity coding in the avian cochlear nucleus angularis.

Authors:  Katrina M MacLeod; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 4.  Inhibition in the balance: binaurally coupled inhibitory feedback in sound localization circuitry.

Authors:  R Michael Burger; Iwao Fukui; Harunori Ohmori; Edwin W Rubel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  GABAergic and glycinergic inhibition modulate monaural auditory response properties in the avian superior olivary nucleus.

Authors:  W L Coleman; M J Fischl; S R Weimann; R M Burger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Heterogeneous calretinin expression in the avian cochlear nucleus angularis.

Authors:  S Bloom; A Williams; K M MacLeod
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-22

7.  Intrinsic firing properties in the avian auditory brain stem allow both integration and encoding of temporally modulated noisy inputs in vitro.

Authors:  Lauren J Kreeger; Arslaan Arshed; Katrina M MacLeod
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Heterogeneity of intrinsic biophysical properties among cochlear nucleus neurons improves the population coding of temporal information.

Authors:  J Ahn; L J Kreeger; S T Lubejko; D A Butts; K M MacLeod
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Effect of sampling frequency on the measurement of phase-locked action potentials.

Authors:  Go Ashida; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Development of NMDA R1 expression in chicken auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Ye-Zhong Tang; C E Carr
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.