Literature DB >> 1297017

Test of four defibrillation dosing strategies using a two-dimensional finite-element model.

J L Lehr1, I F Ramirez, W J Karlon, S R Eisenberg.   

Abstract

The most widely used defibrillation dosing strategy is that adopted by the American Heart Association in 1986. However, several alternative dosing strategies have been proposed to match delivered energy to the individual requirements of defibrillation subjects. In this study, two-dimensional finite element methods are used to investigate the performance of four of these dosing strategies applied to three thoracic models representative of men and women of different thoracic aspect ratios. From the resulting current density distributions, the relative effectiveness of the following dosing strategies are evaluated and compared: constant current; current proportional to body weight; constant energy; energy proportional to body weight. Our results show that the strategy of applying current proportional to subject body weight with a current dose of 0.58 A kg-1 was able to defibrillate all three subjects with only minimal overexposure of any one of them. None of the other dosing strategies examined could be made to successfully defibrillate all three subjects without significantly overexposing at least one.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1297017     DOI: 10.1007/bf02446794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  34 in total

1.  POSTMORTEM STUDIES OF SKINFOLD CALIPER MEASUREMENT AND ACTUAL THICKNESS OF SKIN AND SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE.

Authors:  M M LEE; C K NG
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 0.553

2.  Current required for ventricular defibrillation.

Authors:  J N Patton; J F Pantridge
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-02-24

3.  Energy dosage for human trans-chest electrical ventricular defibrillation.

Authors:  W A Tacker; F M Galioto; E Giuliani; L A Geddes; D G McNamara
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Transthoracic ventricular defibrillation in adults.

Authors:  N P Campbell; S W Webb; A A Adgey; J F Pantridge
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-11-26

5.  Morphologic effects of defibrillation: a preliminary report.

Authors:  S B Karch; M E Billingham
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 6.  Accepted, controversial, and speculative aspects of ventricular defibrillation.

Authors:  R Crampton
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.194

7.  The specific resistance of biological material--a compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist.

Authors:  L A Geddes; L E Baker
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1967-05

8.  Damage in canine hearts following defibrillator shocks.

Authors:  G Lumb; G J Anderson; M L Kase; D V Woo
Journal:  Ann Clin Lab Sci       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.256

9.  Advance prediction of transthoracic impedance in human defibrillation and cardioversion: importance of impedance in determining the success of low-energy shocks.

Authors:  R E Kerber; C Kouba; J Martins; K Kelly; R Low; R Hoyt; D Ferguson; L Bailey; P Bennett; F Charbonnier
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Human thoracic anatomy relevant to implantable artificial hearts.

Authors:  G B Jacobs; T Agishi; R Ecker; T Meaney; R J Kiraly; Y Nosé
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.094

View more
  1 in total

1.  Estimation of current density distribution under electrodes for external defibrillation.

Authors:  Vessela Tz Krasteva; Sava P Papazov
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2002-12-16       Impact factor: 2.819

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.