Literature DB >> 2054239

Determinants of successful transthoracic defibrillation and outcome in ventricular fibrillation.

G W Dalzell1, A A Adgey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine factors determining defibrillation success and outcome in patients with ventricular fibrillation.
DESIGN: Observational prospective study of age, sex, transthoracic impedance, site of cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation duration and amplitude, primary or secondary ventricular fibrillation, aetiology, number of shocks to correct ventricular fibrillation, and drug treatment.
SETTING: A teaching hospital and a mobile coronary care unit with a physician. PATIENTS: 70 consecutive patients (50 male, 20 female) mean age 66.5 years.
INTERVENTIONS: Before the first countershock was administered transthoracic impedance using a 30 kHz low amplitude AC current passed through 8 cm/12 cm self-adhesive defibrillator electrode pads applied in the anteroapical position was measured. The first two shocks were 200 J delivered energy (low energy) and further shocks of 360 J (high energy) were given if required. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Countershock success and outcome from ventricular fibrillation. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: First shock success was significantly greater in inhospital arrests (37/53) than in out-of-hospital arrests (5/17) and in those receiving antiarrhythmic treatment (13/15, 86.7%) v (27/51, 52.9%). Transthoracic impedance was similar in those who were successfully defibrillated with one or two 200 J shocks (98.7 (26) omega) and those who required one or more 360 J shocks (91.4 (23) omega). Success rates with two 200 J shocks were similar in those patients with "high" transthoracic impedance (that is, greater than 115 omega) and those with transthoracic impedance (less than or equal to 115 omega) (8/12 (67%) v 44/58 (76%]. Fine ventricular fibrillation was significantly more common in the patients with a transthoracic impedance of greater than 95 omega (41% (13/32] than in those with a transthoracic impedance less than or equal to 95 omega (13% (5/38]. Death during arrest was significantly more common in patients who needed high energy shocks (14/18 (78%] than in those who needed low energy shocks (16/52 (31%]. Multiple regression analysis identified ventricular fibrillation with an amplitude of greater than or equal to 0.5 mV, age less than or equal to 70 years, and arrests that needed less than or equal to two shocks for defibrillation, in rank order as independent predictors of survival to discharge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2054239      PMCID: PMC1024673          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.65.6.311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  31 in total

1.  The decrease in transthoracic impedance during successive ventricular defibrillation trials.

Authors:  L A Geddes; W A Tacker; P Cabler; R Chapman; R Rivera; H Kidder
Journal:  Med Instrum       Date:  1975 Jul-Aug

2.  Factors determining success and energy requirements for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: revised version.

Authors:  G W Dalzell; J Anderson; A A Adgey
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1991-01

3.  Termination of ventricular fibrillation in dogs by depolarizing a critical amount of myocardium.

Authors:  D P Zipes; J Fischer; R M King; W W Jolly
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  The prediction of the impedance of the thorax to defibrillating current.

Authors:  L A Geddes; W A Tacker; W Schoenlein; M Minton; S Grubbs; P Wilcox
Journal:  Med Instrum       Date:  1976 May-Jun

5.  Transthoracic impedance to direct current discharge: effect of repeated countershocks.

Authors:  C F Dahl; G A Ewy; M D Ewy; E D Thomas
Journal:  Med Instrum       Date:  1976 May-Jun

6.  Contractures and increase in internal longitudianl resistance of cow ventricular muscle induced by hypoxia.

Authors:  J Wojtczak
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Chemical ventricular defibrillation of the human heart with bretylium tosylate.

Authors:  G Sanna; R Arcidiacono
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  The interelectrode electrical resistance at defibrillation.

Authors:  J Kugelberg
Journal:  Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1972

9.  Transthoracic ventricular defibrillation in adults.

Authors:  N P Campbell; S W Webb; A A Adgey; J F Pantridge
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-11-26

10.  The specific resistance of biological material--a compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist.

Authors:  L A Geddes; L E Baker
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1967-05
View more
  4 in total

1.  Monitoring normal and aberrant electrocardiographic activity from an endotracheal tube: comparison of the surface, esophageal, and tracheal electrocardiograms.

Authors:  J K Hayes; J L Peters; K W Smith; C M Craven
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1994-03

2.  Analysis of transthoracic impedance during real cardiac arrest defibrillation attempts in older children and adolescents: are stacked-shocks appropriate?

Authors:  Dana E Niles; Akira Nishisaki; Robert M Sutton; Sara Brunner; Mette Stavland; Shruthi Mahadevaiah; Peter A Meaney; Matthew R Maltese; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 3.  How good is your defibrillation technique?

Authors:  Daniel M Sado; Charles D Deakin
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 18.000

Review 4.  A Systematic Review of the Transthoracic Impedance during Cardiac Defibrillation.

Authors:  Yasmine Heyer; Daniela Baumgartner; Christian Baumgartner
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.