Literature DB >> 25128626

Factors associated with hearing loss in a normal-hearing guinea pig model of Hybrid cochlear implants.

Chiemi Tanaka1, Anh Nguyen-Huynh2, Katherine Loera3, Gemaine Stark4, Lina Reiss5.   

Abstract

The Hybrid cochlear implant (CI), also known as Electro-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS), is a new type of CI that preserves residual acoustic hearing and enables combined cochlear implant and hearing aid use in the same ear. However, 30-55% of patients experience acoustic hearing loss within days to months after activation, suggesting that both surgical trauma and electrical stimulation may cause hearing loss. The goals of this study were to: 1) determine the contributions of both implantation surgery and EAS to hearing loss in a normal-hearing guinea pig model; 2) determine which cochlear structural changes are associated with hearing loss after surgery and EAS. Two groups of animals were implanted (n = 6 per group), with one group receiving chronic acoustic and electric stimulation for 10 weeks, and the other group receiving no direct acoustic or electric stimulation during this time frame. A third group (n = 6) was not implanted, but received chronic acoustic stimulation. Auditory brainstem response thresholds were followed over time at 1, 2, 6, and 16 kHz. At the end of the study, the following cochlear measures were quantified: hair cells, spiral ganglion neuron density, fibrous tissue density, and stria vascularis blood vessel density; the presence or absence of ossification around the electrode entry was also noted. After surgery, implanted animals experienced a range of 0-55 dB of threshold shifts in the vicinity of the electrode at 6 and 16 kHz. The degree of hearing loss was significantly correlated with reduced stria vascularis vessel density and with the presence of ossification, but not with hair cell counts, spiral ganglion neuron density, or fibrosis area. After 10 weeks of stimulation, 67% of implanted, stimulated animals had more than 10 dB of additional threshold shift at 1 kHz, compared to 17% of implanted, non-stimulated animals and 0% of non-implanted animals. This 1-kHz hearing loss was not associated with changes in any of the cochlear measures quantified in this study. The variation in hearing loss after surgery and electrical stimulation in this animal model is consistent with the variation in human patients. Further, these findings illustrate an advantage of a normal-hearing animal model for quantification of hearing loss and damage to cochlear structures without the confounding effects of chemical- or noise-induced hearing loss. Finally, this study is the first to suggest a role of the stria vascularis and damage to the lateral wall in implantation-induced hearing loss. Further work is needed to determine the mechanisms of implantation- and electrical-stimulation-induced hearing loss.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25128626      PMCID: PMC4236540          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  45 in total

1.  Does electrical stimulation of deaf cochleae prevent spiral ganglion degeneration?

Authors:  L Li; C W Parkins; D B Webster
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Protective effect of electrical stimulation in the deafened guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  D O Hartshorn; J M Miller; R A Altschuler
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Electrode insertion trauma in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  M J O'Leary; J Fayad; W F House; F H Linthicum
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.547

4.  Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  T Y Ching; H Dillon; D Byrne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effectiveness of different electrical stimulation conditions in preservation of spiral ganglion cells following deafness.

Authors:  J M Miller; R A Altschuler
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09

6.  Chronic depolarization enhances the trophic effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in rescuing auditory neurons following a sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Anne Coco; Stephanie B Epp; Jeremy M Crook
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig.

Authors:  A Mitchell; J M Miller; P A Finger; J W Heller; Y Raphael; R A Altschuler
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.

Authors:  J Xu; R K Shepherd; R E Millard; G M Clark
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Excitotoxicity and repair of cochlear synapses after noise-trauma induced hearing loss.

Authors:  J L Puel; J Ruel; C Gervais d'Aldin; R Pujol
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-06-22       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  C A Hogan; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  20 in total

1.  Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Paul J Abbas; Viral D Tejani; Rachel A Scheperle; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.

Authors:  Jeong-Seo Kim; Viral D Tejani; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Changes in Gene Expression and Hearing Thresholds After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Hongzheng Zhang; Gemaine Stark; Lina Reiss
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Cochlear implants and other inner ear prostheses: today and tomorrow.

Authors:  Lina Aj Reiss
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-08-14

5.  Morphological correlates of hearing loss after cochlear implantation and electro-acoustic stimulation in a hearing-impaired Guinea pig model.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Gemaine Stark; Anh T Nguyen-Huynh; Kayce A Spear; Hongzheng Zhang; Chiemi Tanaka; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Viral D Tejani; Julia K Omtvedt; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Jacob J Oleson; Marie V Ozanne
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Cochlear Implant Electrode Array From Partial to Full Insertion in Non-Human Primate Model.

Authors:  Raquel Manrique-Huarte; Diego Calavia; Maria Antonia Gallego; Manuel Manrique
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.017

8.  Delayed loss of hearing after hearing preservation cochlear implantation: Human temporal bone pathology and implications for etiology.

Authors:  Alicia M Quesnel; Hideko Heidi Nakajima; John J Rosowski; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Persistence, distribution, and impact of distinctly segmented microparticles on cochlear health following in vivo infusion.

Authors:  Astin M Ross; Sahar Rahmani; Diane M Prieskorn; Acacia F Dishman; Josef M Miller; Joerg Lahann; Richard A Altschuler
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Effect of a liposomal hyaluronic acid gel loaded with dexamethasone in a guinea pig model after manual or motorized cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Elisabeth Mamelle; Naila El Kechai; Benjamin Granger; Olivier Sterkers; Amélie Bochot; Florence Agnely; Evelyne Ferrary; Yann Nguyen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.