Literature DB >> 6725768

Interaural intensity discrimination: insensitivity at 1000 Hz.

D W Grantham.   

Abstract

Recent data from three laboratories have replicated Mills' [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 32, 132-134 (1960)] finding that interaural intensity discrimination is relatively poorer for tones of 1000 Hz than for tones of either higher or lower frequencies. To get a finer look at this frequency effect, interaural intensity difference thresholds were obtained from four subjects for tones of several frequencies around 1000 Hz. An adaptive two-interval forced-choice procedure was employed, in which the overall intensity of the signals was varied randomly in order to prevent subjects from listening to monaural loudness changes. Despite large intersubject differences in overall sensitivity to interaural intensity differences, all four subjects showed a local peak in their threshold functions at or near 1000 Hz. This curious "1000-Hz effect" might be explained by imagining that an interaural intensity comparator operates more efficiently as frequency increases, but that a peripheral interaural intensity difference to interaural-time difference conversion contributes to laterality judgments for low-frequency tones, thus acting to lower thresholds again for frequencies below 1000 Hz.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6725768     DOI: 10.1121/1.390769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  Temporal weighting of binaural information at low frequencies: Discrimination of dynamic interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Anna C Diedesch; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The acoustical bright spot and mislocalization of tones by human listeners.

Authors:  Eric J Macaulay; William M Hartmann; Brad Rakerd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Varying overall sound intensity to the two ears impacts interaural level difference discrimination thresholds by single neurons in the lateral superior olive.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tsai; Kanthaiah Koka; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Interaural level difference discrimination thresholds for single neurons in the lateral superior olive.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Kanthaiah Koka; Jeffrey J Tsai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Perception of auditory, visual, and egocentric spatial alignment adapts differently to changes in eye position.

Authors:  Qi N Cui; Babak Razavi; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Lateralization produced by interaural intensitive disparities appears to be larger for high- vs low-frequency stimuli.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Across-channel interaural-level-difference processing demonstrates frequency dependence.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Olga A Stakhovskaya
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Different patterns of human discrimination learning for two interaural cues to sound-source location.

Authors:  B A Wright; M B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Across-frequency processing of interaural time and level differences in perceived lateralization.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Olga A Stakhovskaya
Journal:  Acta Acust United Acust       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct

10.  Sensitivity to Haptic Sound-Localization Cues at Different Body Locations.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Jana Zgheib; Samuel W Perry
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.