Literature DB >> 20329844

The acoustical bright spot and mislocalization of tones by human listeners.

Eric J Macaulay1, William M Hartmann, Brad Rakerd.   

Abstract

Listeners attempted to localize 1500-Hz sine tones presented in free field from a loudspeaker array, spanning azimuths from 0 degrees (straight ahead) to 90 degrees (extreme right). During this task, the tone levels and phases were measured in the listeners' ear canals. Because of the acoustical bright spot, measured interaural level differences (ILD) were non-monotonic functions of azimuth with a maximum near 55 degrees . In a source-identification task, listeners' localization decisions closely tracked the non-monotonic ILD, and thus became inaccurate at large azimuths. When listeners received training and feedback, their accuracy improved only slightly. In an azimuth-discrimination task, listeners decided whether a first sound was to the left or to the right of a second. The discrimination results also reflected the confusion caused by the non-monotonic ILD, and they could be predicted approximately by a listener's identification results. When the sine tones were amplitude modulated or replaced by narrow bands of noise, interaural time difference (ITD) cues greatly reduced the confusion for most listeners, but not for all. Recognizing the important role of the bright spot requires a reevaluation of the transition between the low-frequency region for localization (mainly ITD) and the high-frequency region (mainly ILD).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20329844      PMCID: PMC2856510          DOI: 10.1121/1.3294654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research.

Authors:  M D Burkhard; R M Sachs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Lateralization of high frequencies based on interaural time differences.

Authors:  D McFadden; E G Pasanen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  On the minimum audible angle--a decision theory approach.

Authors:  W M Hartmann; B Raked
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Detectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms.

Authors:  G B Henning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Binaural interaction in low-frequency stimuli: the inability to trade time and intensity completely.

Authors:  E R Hafter; S C Carrier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Differences of interaural phase and level in detection and lateralization.

Authors:  L A Jeffress; D McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Localization of sound in rooms.

Authors:  W M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Interaural intensity discrimination: insensitivity at 1000 Hz.

Authors:  D W Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Two determinants of localization acuity in the horizontal plane.

Authors:  B R Shelton; C L Searle
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Localization of sound in rooms, II: The effects of a single reflecting surface.

Authors:  B Rakerd; W M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  29 in total

1.  Computing interaural differences through finite element modeling of idealized human heads.

Authors:  Tingli Cai; Brad Rakerd; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sound-source localization as a multisystem process: The Wallach azimuth illusion.

Authors:  William A Yost; M Torben Pastore; Kathryn R Pulling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech Understanding in Noise for Adults With Cochlear Implants: Effects of Hearing Configuration, Source Location Certainty, and Head Movement.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Louise Loiselle; Sarah Natale; Sterling W Sheffield; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Mary S Dietrich; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Onset- and offset-specific effects in interaural level difference discrimination.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker; Andrew D Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Mapping procedures can produce non-centered auditory images in bilateral cochlear implantees.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Localizing the sources of two independent noises: role of time varying amplitude differences.

Authors:  William A Yost; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Tuning to Binaural Cues in Human Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Susan A McLaughlin; Nathan C Higgins; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

8.  Across-channel interaural-level-difference processing demonstrates frequency dependence.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Olga A Stakhovskaya
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Bimodal Hearing or Bilateral Cochlear Implants? Ask the Patient.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.