Literature DB >> 19846626

Perception of auditory, visual, and egocentric spatial alignment adapts differently to changes in eye position.

Qi N Cui1, Babak Razavi, William E O'Neill, Gary D Paige.   

Abstract

Vision and audition represent the outside world in spatial synergy that is crucial for guiding natural activities. Input conveying eye-in-head position is needed to maintain spatial congruence because the eyes move in the head while the ears remain head-fixed. Recently, we reported that the human perception of auditory space shifts with changes in eye position. In this study, we examined whether this phenomenon is 1) dependent on a visual fixation reference, 2) selective for frequency bands (high-pass and low-pass noise) related to specific auditory spatial channels, 3) matched by a shift in the perceived straight-ahead (PSA), and 4) accompanied by a spatial shift for visual and/or bimodal (visual and auditory) targets. Subjects were tested in a dark echo-attenuated chamber with their heads fixed facing a cylindrical screen, behind which a mobile speaker/LED presented targets across the frontal field. Subjects fixated alternating reference spots (0, +/-20 degrees ) horizontally or vertically while either localizing targets or indicating PSA using a laser pointer. Results showed that the spatial shift induced by ocular eccentricity is 1) preserved for auditory targets without a visual fixation reference, 2) generalized for all frequency bands, and thus all auditory spatial channels, 3) paralleled by a shift in PSA, and 4) restricted to auditory space. Findings are consistent with a set-point control strategy by which eye position governs multimodal spatial alignment. The phenomenon is robust for auditory space and egocentric perception, and highlights the importance of controlling for eye position in the examination of spatial perception and behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19846626      PMCID: PMC2822679          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00500.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  70 in total

1.  Timing and laminar profile of eye-position effects on auditory responses in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Kai-Ming G Fu; Ankoor S Shah; Monica N O'Connell; Tammy McGinnis; Haftan Eckholdt; Peter Lakatos; John Smiley; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Eye-centered, head-centered, and complex coding of visual and auditory targets in the intraparietal sulcus.

Authors:  O'dhaniel A Mullette-Gillman; Yale E Cohen; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Applications of prism adaptation: a tutorial in theory and method.

Authors:  Gordon M Redding; Yves Rossetti; Benjamin Wallace
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Horizontal and vertical effects of eye-position on sound localization.

Authors:  Jörg Lewald; Stephan Getzmann
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Auditory-visual spatial integration: a new psychophysical approach using laser pointing to acoustic targets.

Authors:  J Lewald; W H Ehrenstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Gaze-centered remapping of remembered visual space in an open-loop pointing task.

Authors:  D Y Henriques; E M Klier; M A Smith; D Lowy; J D Crawford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The effect of gaze eccentricity on perceived sound direction and its relation to visual localization.

Authors:  J Lewald
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Rapidly induced auditory plasticity: the ventriloquism aftereffect.

Authors:  G H Recanzone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Eye-position effects in directional hearing.

Authors:  J Lewald
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  Extraocular muscle proprioceptors and proprioception.

Authors:  G L Ruskell
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 21.198

View more
  14 in total

1.  Effect of eye position during human visual-vestibular integration of heading perception.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Influence of aging on human sound localization.

Authors:  Marina S Dobreva; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Spatial receptive field shift by preceding cross-modal stimulation in the cat superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jinghong Xu; Tingting Bi; Jing Wu; Fanzhu Meng; Kun Wang; Jiawei Hu; Xiao Han; Jiping Zhang; Xiaoming Zhou; Les Keniston; Liping Yu
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Audio-visual spatial alignment improves integration in the presence of a competing audio-visual stimulus.

Authors:  Justin T Fleming; Abigail L Noyce; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Accumulation and decay of visual capture and the ventriloquism aftereffect caused by brief audio-visual disparities.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Justin T Fleming; Paul D Allen; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Advancing age alters the influence of eye position on sound localization.

Authors:  Qi N Cui; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Influence of age, spatial memory, and ocular fixation on localization of auditory, visual, and bimodal targets by human subjects.

Authors:  Marina S Dobreva; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Experimentally induced deep cervical muscle pain distorts head on trunk orientation.

Authors:  Eva-Maj Malmström; Malmström Eva-Maj; Hans Westergren; Westergren Hans; Per-Anders Fransson; Fransson Per-Anders; Mikael Karlberg; Karlberg Mikael; Måns Magnusson; Magnusson Måns
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  The plastic ear and perceptual relearning in auditory spatial perception.

Authors:  Simon Carlile
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 10.  The Perception of Auditory Motion.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Johahn Leung
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.