Literature DB >> 34071729

Sensitivity to Haptic Sound-Localization Cues at Different Body Locations.

Mark D Fletcher1,2, Jana Zgheib2, Samuel W Perry1,2.   

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) recover hearing in severely to profoundly hearing-impaired people by electrically stimulating the cochlea. While they are extremely effective, spatial hearing is typically severely limited. Recent studies have shown that haptic stimulation can supplement the electrical CI signal (electro-haptic stimulation) and substantially improve sound localization. In haptic sound-localization studies, the signal is extracted from the audio received by behind-the-ear devices and delivered to each wrist. Localization is achieved using tactile intensity differences (TIDs) across the wrists, which match sound intensity differences across the ears (a key sound localization cue). The current study established sensitivity to across-limb TIDs at three candidate locations for a wearable haptic device, namely: the lower tricep and the palmar and dorsal wrist. At all locations, TID sensitivity was similar to the sensitivity to across-ear intensity differences for normal-hearing listeners. This suggests that greater haptic sound-localization accuracy than previously shown can be achieved. The dynamic range was also measured and far exceeded that available through electrical CI stimulation for all of the locations, suggesting that haptic stimulation could provide additional sound-intensity information. These results indicate that an effective haptic aid could be deployed for any of the candidate locations, and could offer a low-cost, non-invasive means of improving outcomes for hearing-impaired listeners.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implant; cross-modal; electro-haptic stimulation; haptic sound-localization; hearing aid; hearing impaired; neuroprosthetic; somatosensory; tactile; vibrotactile

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34071729     DOI: 10.3390/s21113770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


  34 in total

1.  Speech dynamic range and its effect on cochlear implant performance.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Ginger Grant; John Niparko; John Galvin; Robert Shannon; Jane Opie; Phil Segel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS+ processing.

Authors:  D Wesley Grantham; Daniel H Ashmead; Todd A Ricketts; David S Haynes; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Binaural enhancement for bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Vibrotactile Sensitivity in Active Touch: Effect of Pressing Force.

Authors:  Stefano Papetti; Hanna Jarvelainen; Bruno L Giordano; Sebastien Schiesser; Martin Frohlich
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.487

5.  Evaluation of a tactile vocoder for work recognition.

Authors:  P L Brooks; B J Frost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A comparison of vibrotactile thresholds obtained using different diagnostic equipment: the effect of contact conditions.

Authors:  Darren J Whitehouse; Michael J Griffin
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children.

Authors:  J Bench; A Kowal; J Bamford
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-08

8.  Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: prevalence, educational performance, and functional status.

Authors:  F H Bess; J Dodd-Murphy; R A Parker
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Occurrence of the potent mutagens 2- nitrobenzanthrone and 3-nitrobenzanthrone in fine airborne particles.

Authors:  Aldenor G Santos; Gisele O da Rocha; Jailson B de Andrade
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Re-epithelialization and immune cell behaviour in an ex vivo human skin model.

Authors:  Ana Rakita; Nenad Nikolić; Michael Mildner; Johannes Matiasek; Adelheid Elbe-Bürger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Carl A Verschuur
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.