Literature DB >> 6657435

Phonological context in speech perception.

D W Massaro, M M Cohen.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1983        PMID： 6657435     DOI： 10.3758/bf03203046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN： 0031-5117


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  Word-frequency effect and response bias.

Authors:  D E Broadbent
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Letter information and orthographic context in word perception.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.

Authors:  W F Ganong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Authors:  K N Stevens; S E Blumstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Integration of featural information in speech perception.

Authors:  G C Oden; D W Massaro
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Evaluation and integration of acoustic features in speech perception.

Authors:  D W Massaro; G C Oden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 1.840
  7 in total
  18 in total

1.  Flexibility versus generalizability in model selection.

Authors:  Mark A Pitt; Woojae Kim; In Jae Myung
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

2.  Probabilistic constraint satisfaction at the lexical/phonetic interface: evidence for gradient effects of within-category VOT on lexical access.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin; Michael J Spivey
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-01

3.  Dental-to-velar perceptual assimilation: a cross-linguistic study of the perception of dental stop+/l/ clusters.

Authors:  Pierre A Hallé; Catherine T Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Phonological universals constrain the processing of nonspeech stimuli.

Authors:  Iris Berent; Evan Balaban; Tracy Lennertz; Vered Vaknin-Nusbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2010-08

5.  Sensitivity to Phonological Universals: The Case of Stops and Fricatives.

Authors:  Katalin Tamási; Iris Berent
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-08

6.  Vowel and consonant judgments are not independent when cued by the same information.

Authors:  D H Whalen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-09

7.  Perceptual representations of phonotactically illegal syllables.

Authors:  Mara Breen; John Kingston; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The influence of categories on perception: explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference.

Authors:  Naomi H Feldman; Thomas L Griffiths; James L Morgan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Phonological grammar shapes the auditory cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Charlotte Jacquemot; Christophe Pallier; Denis LeBihan; Stanislas Dehaene; Emmanuel Dupoux
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Speech errors reflect the phonotactic constraints in recently spoken syllables, but not in recently heard syllables.

Authors:  Jill A Warker; Ye Xu; Gary S Dell; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.