Literature DB >> 19398099

Speech errors reflect the phonotactic constraints in recently spoken syllables, but not in recently heard syllables.

Jill A Warker1, Ye Xu, Gary S Dell, Cynthia Fisher.   

Abstract

Adults rapidly learn phonotactic constraints from brief production or perception experience. Three experiments asked whether this learning is modality-specific, occurring separately in production and perception, or whether perception transfers to production. Participant pairs took turns repeating syllables in which particular consonants were restricted to particular syllable positions. Speakers' errors reflected learning of the constraints present in the sequences they produced, regardless of whether their partner produced syllables with the same constraints, or opposing constraints. Although partial transfer could be induced (Experiment 3), simply hearing and encoding syllables produced by others did not affect speech production to the extent that error patterns were altered. Learning of new phonotactic constraints was predominantly restricted to the modality in which those constraints were experienced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19398099      PMCID: PMC2720039          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  37 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Separating input and output phonology: semantic, phonological, and orthographic effects in short-term memory impairment.

Authors:  David Howard; Lyndsey Nickels
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Learning artificial phonotactic constraints: time course, durability, and relationship to natural constraints.

Authors:  Conrad F Taylor; George Houghton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production.

Authors:  Kathryn Bock; Gary S Dell; Franklin Chang; Kristine H Onishi
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-09-14

Review 5.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed.

Authors:  Bruno Galantucci; Carol A Fowler; M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

6.  Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect.

Authors:  Gary M Oppenheim; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-04-02

7.  Production constraints on learning novel onset phonotactics.

Authors:  Melissa A Redford
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-01-30

8.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production.

Authors:  A R Bradlow; D B Pisoni; R Akahane-Yamada; Y Tohkura
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Spoonerisms: the structure of errors in the serial order of speech.

Authors:  D G MacKay
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Phonological errors in aphasic naming: comprehension, monitoring and lexicality.

Authors:  L Nickels; D Howard
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  10 in total

1.  Perceptual statistical learning over one week in child speech production.

Authors:  Peter T Richtsmeier; Lisa Goffman
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Learning to speak by listening: Transfer of phonotactics from perception to production.

Authors:  Audrey K Kittredge; Gary S Dell
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  The Frame Constraint on Experimentally Elicited Speech Errors in Japanese.

Authors:  Akie Saito; Tomoyoshi Inoue
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-06

4.  New phonotactic constraints learned implicitly by producing syllable strings generalize to the production of new syllables.

Authors:  Jill A Warker; Gary S Dell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Novel phonotactic learning: Tracking syllable-position and co-occurrence constraints.

Authors:  Amélie Bernard
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  The role of consolidation in learning context-dependent phonotactic patterns in speech and digital sequence production.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Anderson; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Re-examining selective adaptation: Fatiguing feature detectors, or distributional learning?

Authors:  Dave F Kleinschmidt; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

8.  Investigating the retention and time course of phonotactic constraint learning from production experience.

Authors:  Jill A Warker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  How damaged brains repeat words: a computational approach.

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Distinct effects of memory retrieval and articulatory preparation when learning and accessing new word forms.

Authors:  Anni Nora; Hanna Renvall; Jeong-Young Kim; Elisabet Service; Riitta Salmelin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.