Literature DB >> 14573533

Phonological grammar shapes the auditory cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Charlotte Jacquemot1, Christophe Pallier, Denis LeBihan, Stanislas Dehaene, Emmanuel Dupoux.   

Abstract

Languages differ depending on the set of basic sounds they use (the inventory of consonants and vowels) and on the way in which these sounds can be combined to make up words and phrases (phonological grammar). Previous research has shown that our inventory of consonants and vowels affects the way in which our brains decode foreign sounds (Goto, 1971; Näätänen et al., 1997; Kuhl, 2000). Here, we show that phonological grammar has an equally potent effect. We build on previous research, which shows that stimuli that are phonologically ungrammatical are assimilated to the closest grammatical form in the language (Dupoux et al., 1999). In a cross-linguistic design using French and Japanese participants and a fast event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigm, we show that phonological grammar involves the left superior temporal and the left anterior supramarginal gyri, two regions previously associated with the processing of human vocal sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14573533      PMCID: PMC6740464     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  43 in total

1.  Probabilistic mapping and volume measurement of human primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  J Rademacher; P Morosan; T Schormann; A Schleicher; C Werner; H J Freund; K Zilles
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception.

Authors:  A Sharma; M F Dorman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Quantifying variability in the planum temporale: a probability map.

Authors:  C F Westbury; R J Zatorre; A C Evans
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Functional heterogeneity of inferior frontal gyrus is shaped by linguistic experience.

Authors:  L Hsieh; J Gandour; D Wong; G D Hutchins
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Electrophysiological correlates of phonological processing: a cross-linguistic study.

Authors:  G Dehaene-Lambertz; E Dupoux; A Gout
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The role of segmentation in phonological processing: an fMRI investigation.

Authors:  M W Burton; S L Small; S E Blumstein
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe.

Authors:  S K Scott; C C Blank; S Rosen; R J Wise
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Speech-like cerebral activity in profoundly deaf people processing signed languages: implications for the neural basis of human language.

Authors:  L A Petitto; R J Zatorre; K Gauna; E J Nikelski; D Dostie; A C Evans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A new view of language acquisition.

Authors:  P K Kuhl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution.

Authors:  Dietrich Stout; Thierry Chaminade
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Inferior frontal gyrus activation predicts individual differences in perceptual learning of cochlear-implant simulations.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; Carolyn McGettigan; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  MMN responses during implicit processing of changes in emotional prosody: an ERP study using Chinese pseudo-syllables.

Authors:  Aishi Jiang; Jianfeng Yang; Yufang Yang
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  The role of the insular cortex in pitch pattern perception: the effect of linguistic contexts.

Authors:  Patrick C M Wong; Lawrence M Parsons; Michael Martinez; Randy L Diehl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Activation of the left planum temporale in pitch processing is shaped by language experience.

Authors:  Yisheng Xu; Jackson Gandour; Thomas Talavage; Donald Wong; Mario Dzemidzic; Yunxia Tong; Xiaojian Li; Mark Lowe
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Object identification and lexical/semantic access in children: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of word-picture matching.

Authors:  Vincent J Schmithorst; Scott K Holland; Elena Plante
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Neural attunement processes in infants during the acquisition of a language-specific phonemic contrast.

Authors:  Yasuyo Minagawa-Kawai; Koichi Mori; Nozomi Naoi; Shozo Kojima
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Auditory cortical plasticity: does it provide evidence for cognitive processing in the auditory cortex?

Authors:  Dexter R F Irvine
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Domain general change detection accounts for "dishabituation" effects in temporal-parietal regions in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of speech perception.

Authors:  Jason D Zevin; Jianfeng Yang; Jeremy I Skipper; Bruce D McCandliss
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A group independent component analysis of covert verb generation in children: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Prasanna Karunanayaka; Vincent J Schmithorst; Jennifer Vannest; Jerzy P Szaflarski; Elena Plante; Scott K Holland
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.