Literature DB >> 2771622

Vowel and consonant judgments are not independent when cued by the same information.

D H Whalen.   

Abstract

Despite many attempts to define the major unit of speech perception, none has been generally accepted. In a unique study, Mermelstein (1978) claimed that consonants and vowels are the appropriate units because a single piece of information (duration, in this case) can be used for one distinction without affecting the other. In a replication, this apparent independence was found, instead, to reflect a lack of statistical power: The vowel and consonant judgments did interact. In another experiment, interdependence of two phonetic judgments was found in responses based on the fricative noise and the vocalic formants of a fricative-vowel syllable. These results show that each judgment made on speech signals must take into account other judgments that compete for information in the same signal. An account is proposed that takes segments as the primary units, with syllables imposing constraints on the shape they may take.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2771622     DOI: 10.3758/bf03208093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  14 in total

1.  Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English.

Authors:  L J Raphael
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Phonological context in speech perception.

Authors:  D W Massaro; M M Cohen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-10

3.  Segmentation of coarticulated speech in perception.

Authors:  C A Fowler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-10

4.  Segment or syllable? A reaction-time investigation of phonetic processing.

Authors:  W J Barry
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1984 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.500

5.  Phonetic information is integrated across intervening nonlinguistic sounds.

Authors:  D H Whalen; A G Samuel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-06

6.  Effects of vocalic formant transitions and vowel quality on the English [s]-[ŝ] boundary.

Authors:  D H Whalen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [zh]-[s] distinction.

Authors:  V A Mann; B H Repp
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-09

8.  On the relationship between vowel and consonant identification when cued by the same acoustic information.

Authors:  P Mermelstein
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-04

9.  Integration of featural information in speech perception.

Authors:  G C Oden; D W Massaro
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Evaluation and integration of acoustic features in speech perception.

Authors:  D W Massaro; G C Oden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  Contingent categorization in speech perception.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Natasha Bullock-Rest; Ariane E Rhone; Allard Jongman; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.331

2.  Subcategorical phonetic mismatches and lexical access.

Authors:  D H Whalen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-10

3.  Testing the speech unit hypothesis with the primed matching task: phoneme categories are perceptually basic.

Authors:  S Decoene
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-06

4.  Use of vocalic cues to consonant voicing and native language background: the influence of experimental design.

Authors:  C S Crowther; V Mann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-05

5.  What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Allard Jongman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  Relative cue encoding in the context of sophisticated models of categorization: Separating information from categorization.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

7.  Amplitude variations in coarticulated vowels.

Authors:  Ewa Jacewicz; Robert Allen Fox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The Role of Temporal Acoustic Exaggeration in High Variability Phonetic Training: A Behavioral and ERP Study.

Authors:  Bing Cheng; Xiaojuan Zhang; Siying Fan; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-05-24

9.  The socially weighted encoding of spoken words: a dual-route approach to speech perception.

Authors:  Meghan Sumner; Seung Kyung Kim; Ed King; Kevin B McGowan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-09

10.  Syllable Structure Universals and Native Language Interference in Second Language Perception and Production: Positional Asymmetry and Perceptual Links to Accentedness.

Authors:  Bing Cheng; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.