Literature DB >> 6643841

Frequency resolution and discrimination of constant and dynamic tones in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

R S Tyler, E J Wood, M Fernandes.   

Abstract

Frequency resolution and three tasks of frequency discrimination were measured at 500 and 4000 Hz in 12 normal and 12 hearing-impaired listeners. A three-interval, two-alternative forced-choice procedure was used. Frequency resolution was measured with an abbreviated psychoacoustical tuning curve. Frequency discrimination was measured for (1) a fixed-frequency standard and target, (2) a fixed-frequency standard and a frequency-transition target, and (3) frequency-transition standard and a frequency-transition target. The 50-ms frequency transitions had the same final frequency as the standards, but the initial frequency was lowered to obtain about 79% discrimination performance. There was a strong relationship between poor frequency resolution and elevated pure-tone thresholds, but only a very weak relationship between poor frequency discrimination and elevated pure-tone thresholds. Several hearing-impaired listeners had normal discrimination performance together with pure-tone thresholds of 80-90 dB HL. A slight correlation was found between word recognition and frequency discrimination, but a detailed comparison of the phonetic errors and either the frequency-discrimination or frequency-resolution tasks failed to suggest any consistent interdependencies. These results are consistent with previous work that has suggested that frequency resolution and frequency discrimination are independent processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6643841     DOI: 10.1121/1.390043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Using individual differences to test the role of temporal and place cues in coding frequency modulation.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Discrimination of second-format-like frequency transitions.

Authors:  L L Elliott; M A Hammer; T Carrell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-07

4.  Human sensitivity to differences in the rate of auditory cue change.

Authors:  Erin S Maloff; D Wesley Grantham; Daniel H Ashmead
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Impaired timing and frequency discrimination in high-functioning autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Anjali Bhatara; Talin Babikian; Elizabeth Laugeson; Raffi Tachdjian; Yvonne S Sininger
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-10

Review 6.  Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony and its perceptual consequences.

Authors:  Gary Rance
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

7.  Speech recognition and acoustic features in combined electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Yang-soo Yoon; Yongxin Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment.

Authors:  K I Kirk; D B Pisoni; R C Miyamoto
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Judy R Dubno; Virginia M Richards; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

10.  Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Edward Bartlett
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.