Literature DB >> 23654392

Human sensitivity to differences in the rate of auditory cue change.

Erin S Maloff1, D Wesley Grantham, Daniel H Ashmead.   

Abstract

Measurement of sensitivity to differences in the rate of change of auditory signal parameters is complicated by confounds among duration, extent, and velocity of the changing signal. Dooley and Moore [(1988) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84(4), 1332-1337] proposed a method for measuring sensitivity to rate of change using a duration discrimination task. They reported improved duration discrimination when an additional intensity or frequency change cue was present. The current experiments were an attempt to use this method to measure sensitivity to the rate of change in intensity and spatial position. Experiment 1 investigated whether duration discrimination was enhanced when additional cues of rate of intensity change, rate of spatial position change, or both were provided. Experiment 2 determined whether participant listening experience or the testing environment influenced duration discrimination task performance. Experiment 3 assessed whether duration discrimination could be used to measure sensitivity to rates of changes in intensity and spatial position for stimuli with lower rates of change, as well as emphasizing the constancy of the velocity cue. Results of these experiments showed that duration discrimination was impaired rather than enhanced by the additional velocity cues. The findings are discussed in terms of the demands of listening to concurrent changes along multiple auditory dimensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23654392      PMCID: PMC3663864          DOI: 10.1121/1.4796102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Duration discrimination and subjective duration for ramped and damped sounds.

Authors:  R S Schlauch; D T Ries; J J DiGiovanni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Minimum audible movement angle in the horizontal plane as a function of stimulus frequency and bandwidth, source azimuth, and velocity.

Authors:  D W Chandler; D W Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory spatial resolution in horizontal, vertical, and diagonal planes.

Authors:  D Wesley Grantham; Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Eric A Erpenbeck
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The involuntary capture of attention by sound: novelty and postnovelty distraction in young and older adults.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Pilar Andrés
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2010

5.  Minimum audible movement angle as a function of signal frequency and the velocity of the source.

Authors:  D R Perrott; J Tucker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level.

Authors:  W Jesteadt; C C Wier; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Frequency resolution and discrimination of constant and dynamic tones in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  R S Tyler; E J Wood; M Fernandes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Age effects on measures of auditory duration discrimination.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons; S Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-06

10.  Minimum auditory movement angle: binaural localization of moving sound sources.

Authors:  D R Perrott; A D Musicant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.