Literature DB >> 7878505

Laparoscopic management of choledocholithiasis.

A L DePaula1, K Hashiba, M Bafutto.   

Abstract

The authors report on a group of 114 patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones who were treated by laparoscopic surgery. Management through the cystic duct was considered the first option. Choledochotomy was used for those patients in which the cystic approach was not possible or was unsuccessful. Transcystic lithotripsy was considered for patients with CBD stones in disproportion with the size of the cystic duct. Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy was indicated as a drainage procedure. The transcystic approach was used in 89.5% of the patients; choledochotomy was used in 6.2%; and both ways were used in 4.3%. Different procedures were used, including mechanical and electrohydraulic lithotripsy, choledochotomy with T-tube or endoprostheses drainage, laparoscopic sphincterotomy, end-to-end common bile duct anastomosis, and choledochoduodenum anastomosis. One of the patients was in the 21st week of pregnancy. The laparoscopic approach to choledocholithiasis was successfully performed in 94.8% of the patients. Mean hospital stay was 1.7 days. There was a 6.2% incidence of complications and the mortality rate was 0.9%. In 84.3% of the patients, the transcystic approach was used successfully, with a complication rate of 4.9% and a mean hospital stay of 1.6 days. Three patients were converted to open surgery early in this series. Thus far, one patients has presented residual CBD stones. The results obtained suggest that laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is a technically feasible procedure, with low complication and mortality rates, although it requires adequate selection of patients and a variety of techniques and types of equipment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7878505     DOI: 10.1007/bf00187344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 12,397 patients.

Authors:  T R Scott; K A Zucker; R W Bailey
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1992-09

2.  Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology.

Authors:  J B Petelin
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-03

3.  [Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of vater and extraction of stones from the choledochal duct (author's transl)].

Authors:  M Classen; L Demling
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1974-03-15       Impact factor: 0.628

4.  Predictive ability of choledocholithiasis indicators. A prospective evaluation.

Authors:  M Hauer-Jensen; R Kåresen; K Nygaard; K Solheim; E Amlie; O Havig; K O Viddal
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The incidence and causes of death following surgery for nonmalignant biliary tract disease.

Authors:  C K McSherry; F Glenn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications.

Authors:  J L Flowers; K A Zucker; S M Graham; W A Scovill; A L Imbembo; R W Bailey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Intraoperative cholangiography. A review of indications and analysis of age-sex groups.

Authors:  S B Levine; H J Lerner; E D Leifer; S R Lindheim
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  M E Arregui; C J Davis; A M Arkush; R F Nagan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Retained and recurrent bile duct stones. Surgical or nonsurgical removal?

Authors:  R M Girard; G Legros
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy.

Authors:  A L DePaula; K Hashiba; M Bafutto; R Zago; M M Machado
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-06
View more
  16 in total

1.  A balanced approach to choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  M C Lilly; M E Arregui
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis using modified biliary stents.

Authors:  E K Kim; S K Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  S Lyass; E H Phillips
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  SSAT/SAGES minimally invasive surgeryAdvanced laparoscopic hepatobiliary surgery

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic endobiliary stenting: a simplified approach to the management of occult common bile duct stones.

Authors:  R D Fanelli; K S Gersin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  A study of preoperative factors associated with a poor outcome following laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Hamish Noble; Elise Whitley; Sally Norton; Michael Thompson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), and common bile duct stones (CBDS) extraction for management of patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

Authors:  G D De Palma; L Angrisani; M Lorenzo; E Di Matteo; C Catanzano; G Persico; B Tesauro
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Comparison of long-term results of laparoscopic and endoscopic exploration of common bile duct.

Authors:  S S Rai; V V Grubnik; O L Kovalchuk; O V Grubnik
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 9.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  J B Petelin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  I J Martin; I S Bailey; M Rhodes; N O'Rourke; L Nathanson; G Fielding
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.