Literature DB >> 4015213

Predictive ability of choledocholithiasis indicators. A prospective evaluation.

M Hauer-Jensen, R Kåresen, K Nygaard, K Solheim, E Amlie, O Havig, K O Viddal.   

Abstract

To assess the predictive ability of various indicators of common bile duct calculi, 457 patients undergoing cholecystectomy for gallstone disease were prospectively screened for the presence of 11 predefined criteria of possible choledocholithiasis. The predictive ability of the criteria, individually and in combinations, was determined. For all criteria, except a history of pancreatitis, a significantly increased incidence of choledocholithiasis was found. The number of positive criteria correlated positively with the frequency of common bile duct calculi. The negative predictive value and sensitivity of the total set of criteria were 98% and 89.5%, respectively. Following common duct exploration, the number of complications and the duration of postoperative hospitalization were significantly increased as compared with simple cholecystectomy. Peroperative cholangiography with cholecystectomy is recommended in all patients, with one or more criteria of possible choledocholithiasis. Routine peroperative cholangiography in patients with no positive criteria does not seem to be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4015213      PMCID: PMC1250838          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198507000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  21 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of operative cholangiography.

Authors:  J C Skillings; J S Williams; J R Hinshaw
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Routine operative cholangiography: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  R M Seif
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Gallstone migration as a cause of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  J M Acosta; C L Ledesma
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Endoscopic papillotomy: technique and experience with 204 patients.

Authors:  A R Rosseland; M Osnes
Journal:  Curr Surg       Date:  1980 May-Jun

5.  Indications for exploration of the bile ducts.

Authors:  M Hashmonai; R Arisson; A Schramek
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1980 May-Jun

6.  Routine operative cholangiography with cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M E Stark; C W Loughry
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1980-11

7.  Exploration of the common bile duct--the relevance of the clinical picture and the importance of peroperative cholangiography.

Authors:  B Cranley; H Logan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Indications and accuracy of operative cholangiography.

Authors:  T J Pagana; L H Stahlgren
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1980-10

9.  Choledochotomy in nonmalignant disease of the biliary tract.

Authors:  F Glenn
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1967-05

10.  Preoperative evaluation of the risk of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  F Lacaine; M B Corlette; H Bismuth
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1980-09
View more
  27 in total

1.  Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Qian D Zhu; Chong L Tao; Meng T Zhou; Zheng P Yu; Hong Q Shi; Qi Y Zhang
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Practical recommendations for the prediction and management of common bile duct stones in patients with gallstones.

Authors:  N A Kama; M Atli; M Doganay; M Kologlu; E Reis; M Dolapci
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Transcholecystic operative cholangiography: an alternative technique: Assessor's comment.

Authors:  J P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Prediction of which patients with an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram will have a confirmed stone at ERCP.

Authors:  Matthew P Spinn; David S Wolf; Dharmendra Verma; Frank J Lukens
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Laparoscopic ultrasonography as compared with static or dynamic cholangiography at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective multicenter trial.

Authors:  G V Stiegmann; N J Soper; C J Filipi; R C McIntyre; M P Callery; J F Cordova
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Consequences of routine peroperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy for gallstone disease: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  M Hauer-Jensen; R Kåresen; K Nygaard; K Solheim; E Amlie; O Havig; K O Viddal
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy as an alternative to common bile duct exploration and T-tube drainage.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Predictive ability of choledocholithiasis indicators.

Authors:  J Derodra
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Comparison of operative ultrasonography and radiography in screening of the common bile duct for calculi.

Authors:  J J Jakimowicz; H Rutten; P J Jürgens; E J Carol
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  CHOLECYSTECTOMY : FUNDUS TO PORTA APPROACH.

Authors:  H R Gupta; K K Maudar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.