Literature DB >> 655922

The visually evoked response. Binocular facilitation and failure when binocular vision is disturbed.

R Srebro.   

Abstract

The visually evoked response (VER) caused by the horizontal sinusoidal movement of a display consisting of a checkerboard with 15-minute checks of relatively low contrast oscillating at 6.3 Hz is itself sinusoidal with a frequency of 12.6 Hz. When viewed binocularly, the VER is 25% to 30% greater in amplitude than the sum of the amplitudes for monocular viewing. This binocular faciltation may be a VER correlate of normal binocular single vision. It is lost in small-angle esotropes and in normals whose binocular function is disturbed by a vertical prism placed over one eye. Characteristic curves relating VER amplitude and phase angle to frequency to oscillation of the checker-board display suggest that two "systems" carry information to the visual cortex: a long and a short latency system. In amblyopia, the long latency system may be selectively impaired.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 655922     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1978.03910050445009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  14 in total

1.  Binocular summation in visual evoked cortical potential in patients who have significantly different P100 peak latencies in their two eyes.

Authors:  Atsushi Mizota; Akiko Hoshino; Emiko Adachi-Usami; Naoya Fujimoto
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  The effects of interocular differences in retinal illuminance on vision and binocularity.

Authors:  Yoon-Hee Chang; Jong Bok Lee; Nam Soo Kim; Dong Wook Lee; Jee Ho Chang; Sueng-Han Han
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Monocular and binocular steady-state flicker VEPs: frequency-response functions to sinusoidal and square-wave luminance modulation.

Authors:  David S Nicol; Ruth Hamilton; Uma Shahani; Daphne L McCulloch
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Nonlinearities in binocular visual evoked potentials in children.

Authors:  R T Paley; V G Sutija; H A Solan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Incremental binocular amplitude of the pattern visual evoked potential during the first five months of life: electrophysiological evidence of the development of binocularity.

Authors:  A Penne; P Baraldi; S Fonda; F Ferrari
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Alteration of the visual evoked potential by macular holes: comparison with optic neuritis.

Authors:  L N Johnson; R D Yee; R S Hepler; D A Martin
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Binocular summation in normal, monocularly deprived, and strabismic cats: visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  G Sclar; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Binocular interaction and steady-state visual evoked potentials. I. A study in normal subjects and in subjects with defective binocular vision.

Authors:  B Bagolini; V Porciatti; B Falsini
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Functional burden of strabismus: decreased binocular summation and binocular inhibition.

Authors:  Stacy L Pineles; Federico G Velez; Sherwin J Isenberg; Zachary Fenoglio; Eileen Birch; Steven Nusinowitz; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.389

10.  Binocular interactions and steady-state VEPs. A study in normal and defective binocular vision (Part II).

Authors:  B Bagolini; B Falsini; S Cermola; V Porciatti
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.