Literature DB >> 2806037

Nonlinearities in binocular visual evoked potentials in children.

R T Paley1, V G Sutija, H A Solan.   

Abstract

Evidence is controversial in respect to the optimal conditions in which visual evoked potentials provide an objective measure of binocular visual function, related and unrelated to stereopsis, and there is little emphasis on the type of stimulus that produces facilitation in binocular recording. We investigated the effects of stimulus type (flicker or pattern), contrast, and temporal modulation on facilitation, which was defined as a binocular response greater than sum of monocular responses. Monocular and binocular responses to sinusoidally modulated flicker and grating patterns were recorded in children and Fourier analyzed. The relationship of the fundamental Fourier component for flicker and the second harmonic component for pattern were each examined as function of temporal modulation at two levels of contrast for monocular and binocular visual evoked potentials. Binocular facilitation was found across all conditions for flicker. Data suggest that processing of pattern and flicker has different sites of origin within the visual system. Facilitation in binocular visual evoked potentials also indicates that they are not a result of simple summation of monocular responses, since there appears a nonlinear component to such interaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2806037     DOI: 10.1007/bf00155209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  16 in total

1.  Objective evaluation of binocular function with pattern reversal VER. III. Effect of stimulus size and localization.

Authors:  O Katsumi; T Tanino; T Hirose
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1986-12

2.  Objective evaluation of binocular function using the pattern reversal visual evoked response. II. Effect of mean luminosity.

Authors:  O Katsumi; T Tanino; T Hirose
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1986-04

3.  Effect of age on contrast sensitivity function: uniocular and binocular findings.

Authors:  J E Ross; D D Clarke; A J Bron
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Binocularity in the human visual evoked potential: facilitation, summation and suppression.

Authors:  P A Apkarian; K Nakayama; C W Tyler
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-01

5.  Binocular VEP summation in infants and adults with abnormal binocular histories.

Authors:  S L Shea; R N Aslin; D McCulloch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Further developments in binocular summation.

Authors:  R Blake; M Sloane; R Fox
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-09

7.  Cyclopean stimulation can influence sensations of self-motion in normal and stereoblind subjects.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; R Held
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-08

8.  Monocular versus binocular visual acuity.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1965-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The visually evoked response. Binocular facilitation and failure when binocular vision is disturbed.

Authors:  R Srebro
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-05

10.  Binocular vision tested with visual evoked potentials in children and infants.

Authors:  G Amigo; A Fiorentini; M Pirchio; D Spinelli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.