Literature DB >> 21279419

Monocular and binocular steady-state flicker VEPs: frequency-response functions to sinusoidal and square-wave luminance modulation.

David S Nicol1, Ruth Hamilton, Uma Shahani, Daphne L McCulloch.   

Abstract

Steady-state VEPs to full-field flicker (FFF) using sinusoidally modulated light were compared with those elicited by square-wave modulated light across a wide range of stimulus frequencies with monocular and binocular FFF stimulation. Binocular and monocular VEPs were elicited in 12 adult volunteers to FFF with two modes of temporal modulation: sinusoidal or square-wave (abrupt onset and offset, 50% duty cycle) at ten temporal frequencies ranging from 2.83 to 58.8 Hz. All stimuli had a mean luminance of 100 cd/m(2) with an 80% modulation depth (20-180 cd/m(2)). Response magnitudes at the stimulus frequency (F1) and at the double and triple harmonics (F2 and F3) were compared. For both sinusoidal and square-wave flicker, the FFF-VEP magnitudes at F1 were maximal for 7.52 Hz flicker. F2 was maximal for 5.29 Hz flicker, and F3 magnitudes are largest for flicker stimulation from 3.75 to 7.52 Hz. Square-wave flicker produced significantly larger F1 and F2 magnitudes for slow flicker rates (up to 5.29 Hz for F1; at 2.83 and 3.75 Hz for F2). The F3 magnitudes were larger overall for square-wave flicker. Binocular FFF-VEP magnitudes are larger than those of monocular FFF-VEPs, and the amount of this binocular enhancement is not dependant on the mode of flicker stimulation (mean binocular: monocular ratio 1.41, 95% CI: 1.2-1.6). Binocular enhancement of F1 for 21.3 Hz flicker was increased to a factor of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.8-3.5). In the healthy adult visual system, FFF-VEP magnitudes can be characterized by the frequency-response functions of F1, F2 and F3. Low-frequency roll-off in the FFF-VEP magnitudes is greater for sinusoidal flicker than for square-wave flicker for rates ≤ 5.29 Hz; magnitudes for higher-frequency flicker are similar for the two types of flicker. Binocular FFF-VEPs are larger overall than those recorded monocularly, and this binocular summation is enhanced at 21.3 Hz in the mid-frequency range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21279419     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-011-9260-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  24 in total

1.  Variability of the steady-state visually evoked potential: interindividual variance and intraindividual reproducibility of spatial frequency tuning.

Authors:  W Joost; M Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Fourier-analysed steady-state VEPs in pre-school children with and without normal binocularity.

Authors:  Björn Johansson; Peter Jakobsson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials (2009 update).

Authors:  J Vernon Odom; Michael Bach; Mitchell Brigell; Graham E Holder; Daphne L McCulloch; Alma Patrizia Tormene
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Contrast evoked responses in man.

Authors:  H Spekreijse; L H van der Twell; T Zuidema
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Binocularity in the human visual evoked potential: facilitation, summation and suppression.

Authors:  P A Apkarian; K Nakayama; C W Tyler
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-01

6.  Spatial frequency sweep VEP: visual acuity during the first year of life.

Authors:  A M Norcia; C W Tyler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  An electrophysiological technique for assessment of the development of spatial vision.

Authors:  V Zemon; E E Hartmann; J Gordon; A Prünte-Glowazki
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  The visually evoked response. Binocular facilitation and failure when binocular vision is disturbed.

Authors:  R Srebro
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-05

9.  Temporal frequency responsivity shows multiple maturational phases: state-dependent visual evoked potential luminance flicker fusion from birth to 9 months.

Authors:  P Apkarian
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Electrophysiological evidence of cortical fusion in children with early-onset esotropia.

Authors:  M Eizenman; C A Westall; I Geer; K Smith; S Chatterjee; C M Panton; S P Kraft; B Skarf
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.