Literature DB >> 3582995

Alteration of the visual evoked potential by macular holes: comparison with optic neuritis.

L N Johnson, R D Yee, R S Hepler, D A Martin.   

Abstract

Nine patients with maculopathy (macular holes, macular cysts, and lamellar holes) and ten patients with optic neuritis were examined in order to determine changes in the visual evoked potential (VEP) in response to pattern-reversal stimulation. Eyes with lamellar holes had normal P100 latency, but eyes with macular cysts and macular holes had prolonged P100 latency. Eyes with optic neuritis exhibited greater prolongation of the P100 latency than eyes with macular holes. In contrast, eyes with macular holes had a greater reduction in the steady-state VEP amplitude than eyes with optic neuritis. The prolonged latency occurring in maculopathy may be due to a peculiar amplitude summation noted with half-field VEP, rather than to a true conduction delay like that seen in eyes with optic neuritis. The amplitude slope, which is usually positive in normal controls, was negative for 85.7% of eyes with macular holes and 69.2% of eyes with optic neuritis. The negative amplitude slope may represent a subtle defect in retinal ganglion X cells. Eyes with significantly lower values for four or more of the nine central test points on quantitative automated perimetry had negative amplitude slopes and prolonged P100 latency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3582995     DOI: 10.1007/bf02160343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  25 in total

Review 1.  Is amblyopia due to inappropriate stimulation of the "sustained" pathway during development?

Authors:  H Ikeda; M J Wright
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Evoked cortical responses to checkerboard patterns: effect of check-size as a function of visual acuity.

Authors:  M R Harter; C T White
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1970-01

3.  Age-related changes in the latency of the visual evoked potential: influence of check size.

Authors:  S Sokol; A Moskowitz; V L Towle
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-05

4.  Independence of evoked potentials and apparent size.

Authors:  D Regan; W Richards
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Electrophysiologic tests in assessment of senile macular degeneration.

Authors:  M Marcus; S Merin; M Wolf; M Feinsod
Journal:  Ann Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-03

6.  Neurophysiological investigation in optic nerve disease: combined assessment of the visual evoked response and electroretinogram.

Authors:  H Ikeda; K E Tremain; M D Sanders
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Effect of refractive error on the visual evoked response.

Authors:  D W Collins; W M Carroll; J L Black; M Walsh
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-01-27

8.  The visually evoked response. Binocular facilitation and failure when binocular vision is disturbed.

Authors:  R Srebro
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-05

9.  Evoked potential and preferential looking estimates of visual acuity in pediatric patients.

Authors:  S Sokol; V C Hansen; A Moskowitz; P Greenfield; V L Towle
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Subclinical visual field defects in multiple sclerosis. Demonstration and quantification with automated perimetry, and comparison with visually evoked potentials.

Authors:  O Mienberg; J Flammer; H P Ludin
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.849

View more
  6 in total

1.  Retinal origin of VECP delays as revealed by simultaneously recorded ERG to patterned stimuli.

Authors:  R Lorenz; W Heider
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Evoked responses in patients with macular holes.

Authors:  R G Smith; G M Brimlow; S J Lea; N R Galloway
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Visual evoked potentials in macular hole.

Authors:  M Kato; T Nakagami; I Watanabe
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Contribution of scanning laser ophthalmoscopy to the functional investigation of subjects with macular holes.

Authors:  J F Le Gargasson; F Rigaudiere; J E Guez; A Gaudric; Y Grall
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Dichoptic multifocal visual evoked potentials identify local retinal dysfunction in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Faran Sabeti; Andrew C James; Rohan W Essex; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Pattern-reversal visual-evoked potential in patients with occult macular dystrophy.

Authors:  Gen Hanazono; Hisao Ohde; Kei Shinoda; Kazushige Tsunoda; Kazuo Tsubota; Yozo Miyake
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-12-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.