Literature DB >> 3956626

Binocular summation in normal, monocularly deprived, and strabismic cats: visual evoked potentials.

G Sclar, I Ohzawa, R D Freeman.   

Abstract

We have studied visual evoked potentials (VEP) in the cat using dichoptically presented sinusoidal gratings. Our goals were to determine if binocular disparity causes differential responses in the VEP, and to examine the effects of monocular deprivation and convergent or divergent strabismus on the degree of binocular summation. Binocular disparity in stimuli causes no regular alterations of visual evoked responses, except at very low spatial frequencies. However, this apparent selectivity is probably due to luminance modulation in the central retina at low frequencies. The insensitivity to binocular disparity establishes that binocular summation in the VEP may be estimated without regard to the relative phase of gratings presented to the two eyes. Binocular summation of the VEP was examined in normal animals. We found that the ratio of the binocularly evoked response to the largest monocular response (averaged across spatial frequency) ranged from 1.27 to 2.12 (4 animals) and had a mean of 1.48. These values fall within the range which has been reported for human subjects. The degree of summation might be expected to be greatly reduced in strabismic and monocularly deprived animals, in which the majority of the cells are functionally monocular. While summation was found to be reduced in 5 esotropic (convergent) animals (range = 1.13-1.24; mean = 1.18) it was approximately normal in three exotropic (divergent) animals (range = 1.29-2.12; mean = 1.61). However, single unit recordings carried out on the same animals show similar reductions of cells that can be driven through either eye for both groups of animals. Recordings from three monocularly deprived animals, on the other hand, show evidence of binocular interaction in the form of suppression. In this case, response amplitudes obtained using binocular stimulation were consistently and substantially smaller than those obtained from the normal eye alone (range = 0.76-0.85; mean = 0.80). We conclude that convergent and divergent strabismus differ substantially in the degree to which binocular summation is exhibited in the VEP, which in the latter condition, is indistinguishable from the normal cat. Monocular deprivation causes an effect which is markedly different from either form of strabismus in that the deprived eye suppresses the response of the normal eye.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3956626     DOI: 10.1007/bf00237398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Residual eye movements in receptive-field studies of paralyzed cats.

Authors:  R W Rodieck; J D Pettigrew; P O Bishop; T Nikara
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Visual evoked response of single cells and of the EEG in primary visual area of the cat.

Authors:  O Creutzfeldt; A Rosina; M Ito; W Probst
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Binocular summation in the evoked potential as a function of image quality.

Authors:  C T White; L Bonelli
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1970-04

4.  An electrophysiological correlate of perceptual suppression in anisometropia.

Authors:  A Fiorentini; L Maffei; M Pirchio; D Spinelli
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Lateralized cortical potentials evoked in humans by dynamic random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  D Lehmann; B Julesz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  A new approach to the study of binocular interaction in visual cortex: normal and monocularly deprived cats.

Authors:  R D Freeman; J G Robson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Differential responsiveness of simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex to visual texture.

Authors:  P Hammond; D M MacKay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1977-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The visually evoked response. Binocular facilitation and failure when binocular vision is disturbed.

Authors:  R Srebro
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-05

9.  Response properties of striate cortex neurons in cats raised with divergent or convergent strabismus.

Authors:  R E Kalil; P D Spear; A Langsetmo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Binocular vision tested with visual evoked potentials in children and infants.

Authors:  G Amigo; A Fiorentini; M Pirchio; D Spinelli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  4 in total

1.  Improvement in binocular summation after strabismus surgery.

Authors:  Stacy L Pineles; Joseph L Demer; Sherwin J Isenberg; Eileen E Birch; Federico G Velez
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Binocular Disparity Selectivity Weakened after Monocular Deprivation in Mouse V1.

Authors:  Benjamin Scholl; Jagruti J Pattadkal; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Stimulating both eyes with matching stimuli enhances V1 responses.

Authors:  Blake A Mitchell; Kacie Dougherty; Jacob A Westerberg; Brock M Carlson; Loïc Daumail; Alexander Maier; Michele A Cox
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-04-01

4.  Improvement of binocular summation in intermittent exotropia following successful postoperative alignment.

Authors:  YuePing Li; Juan Ding; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.