Literature DB >> 25667015

A simple procedure for estimating pseudo risk ratios from exposure to non-carcinogenic chemical mixtures.

Franco Scinicariello1, Christopher Portier2.   

Abstract

Non-cancer risk assessment traditionally assumes a threshold of effect, below which there is a negligible risk of an adverse effect. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry derives health-based guidance values known as Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) as estimates of the toxicity threshold for non-carcinogens. Although the definition of an MRL, as well as EPA reference dose values (RfD and RfC), is a level that corresponds to "negligible risk," they represent daily exposure doses or concentrations, not risks. We present a new approach to calculate the risk at exposure to specific doses for chemical mixtures, the assumption in this approach is to assign de minimis risk at the MRL. The assigned risk enables the estimation of parameters in an exponential model, providing a complete dose-response curve for each compound from the chosen point of departure to zero. We estimated parameters for 27 chemicals. The value of k, which determines the shape of the dose-response curve, was moderately insensitive to the choice of the risk at the MRL. The approach presented here allows for the calculation of a risk from a single substance or the combined risk from multiple chemical exposures in a community. The methodology is applicable from point of departure data derived from quantal data, such as data from benchmark dose analyses or from data that can be transformed into probabilities, such as lowest-observed-adverse-effect level. The individual risks are used to calculate risk ratios that can facilitate comparison and cost-benefit analyses of environmental contamination control strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptable risk; Benchmark dose; Lowest-observed-adverse effect; Minimal Risk Levels; Point of departure; Risk assessment; Toxicological mixtures

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25667015      PMCID: PMC5700810          DOI: 10.1007/s00204-015-1467-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  11 in total

Review 1.  Procedures for calculating benchmark doses for health risk assessment.

Authors:  D Gaylor; L Ryan; D Krewski; Y Zhu
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Dose-response relationships for polyhalogenated dioxins and dibenzofurans following subchronic treatment in mice. I. CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 enzyme activity in liver, lung, and skin.

Authors:  M J DeVito; J J Diliberto; D G Ross; M G Menache; L S Birnbaum
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Health effects classification and its role in the derivation of minimal risk levels: immunological effects.

Authors:  H G Abadin; C-H S J Chou; F T Llados
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 4.  The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and Mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds.

Authors:  Martin Van den Berg; Linda S Birnbaum; Michael Denison; Mike De Vito; William Farland; Mark Feeley; Heidelore Fiedler; Helen Hakansson; Annika Hanberg; Laurie Haws; Martin Rose; Stephen Safe; Dieter Schrenk; Chiharu Tohyama; Angelika Tritscher; Jouko Tuomisto; Mats Tysklind; Nigel Walker; Richard E Peterson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  Utilizing uncertainty factors in minimal risk levels derivation.

Authors:  H R Pohl; H G Abadin
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  A new method for determining allowable daily intakes.

Authors:  K S Crump
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1984-10

7.  A unified approach to risk assessment for cancer and noncancer endpoints based on benchmark doses and uncertainty/safety factors.

Authors:  D W Gaylor; R L Kodell; J J Chen; D Krewski
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  Evaluation of toxic equivalency factors for induction of cytochromes P450 CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 enzyme activity by dioxin-like compounds.

Authors:  Hiroyoshi Toyoshiba; Nigel J Walker; A John Bailer; Christopher J Portier
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 4.219

9.  Dose-additive carcinogenicity of a defined mixture of "dioxin-like compounds".

Authors:  Nigel J Walker; Patrick W Crockett; Abraham Nyska; Amy E Brix; Michael P Jokinen; Donald M Sells; James R Hailey; Micheal Easterling; Joseph K Haseman; Ming Yin; Michael E Wyde; John R Bucher; Christopher J Portier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  A mixture of dioxins, furans, and non-ortho PCBs based upon consensus toxic equivalency factors produces dioxin-like reproductive effects.

Authors:  J T Hamm; C-Y Chen; L S Birnbaum
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2003-05-02       Impact factor: 4.849

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of occupational exposure to different levels of mixed organic solvents and cognitive function in the painting unit of an automotive industry.

Authors:  Farideh Golbabaei; Fateme Dehghani; Mohammad Saatchi; Seyed Abolfazl Zakerian
Journal:  Health Promot Perspect       Date:  2018-10-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.