Literature DB >> 29904240

Autologistic models for benchmark risk or vulnerability assessment of urban terrorism outcomes.

Jingyu Liu1, Walter W Piegorsch2, A Grant Schissler3, Susan L Cutter4.   

Abstract

We develop a quantitative methodology to characterize vulnerability among 132 U.S. urban centers ('cities') to terrorist events, applying a place-based vulnerability index to a database of terrorist incidents and related human casualties. A centered autologistic regression model is employed to relate urban vulnerability to terrorist outcomes and also to adjust for autocorrelation in the geospatial data. Risk-analytic 'benchmark' techniques are then incorporated into the modeling framework, wherein levels of high and low urban vulnerability to terrorism are identified. This new, translational adaptation of the risk-benchmark approach, including its ability to account for geospatial autocorrelation, is seen to operate quite flexibly in this socio-geographic setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benchmark dose; Centered autologistic model; Geospatial analysis; Maximum pseudo-likelihood; Quantitative risk analysis; Spatial autocorrelation

Year:  2017        PMID: 29904240      PMCID: PMC5994772          DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc        ISSN: 0964-1998            Impact factor:   2.483


  8 in total

1.  Benchmark dose calculation from epidemiological data.

Authors:  E Budtz-Jørgensen; N Keiding; P Grandjean
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Risk analysis and risk management in an uncertain world.

Authors:  Howard Kunreuther
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Benchmark analysis: shopping with proper confidence.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; R Webster West
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  On the definition of vulnerabilities in measuring risks to infrastructures.

Authors:  Yacov Y Haimes
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Benchmark analysis for quantifying urban vulnerability to terrorist incidents.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Susan L Cutter; Frank Hardisty
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Summarizing risk using risk measures and risk indices.

Authors:  Cameron A MacKenzie
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  A new method for determining allowable daily intakes.

Authors:  K S Crump
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1984-10

8.  Multiple Scales of Control on the Structure and Spatial Distribution of Woody Vegetation in African Savanna Watersheds.

Authors:  Nicholas R Vaughn; Gregory P Asner; Izak P J Smit; Edward S Riddel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Adjusting statistical benchmark risk analysis to account for non-spatial autocorrelation, with application to natural hazard risk assessment.

Authors:  Jingyu Liu; Walter W Piegorsch; A Grant Schissler; Rachel R McCaster; Susan L Cutter
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 1.416

2.  From terrorism to flooding: How vulnerable is your city?

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Rachel R McCaster; Susan L Cutter
Journal:  Signif (Oxf)       Date:  2021-02-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.