Literature DB >> 20877488

Predicting low dose effects for chemicals in high through-put studies.

Edward J Stanek1, Edward J Calabrese.   

Abstract

High through-put studies commonly use automated systems with 96-well plates in which multiple chemicals are tested at multiple doses using log-2 dose increments after a suitable incubation period. There are typically multiple (ranging from five to eleven) doses on each chemical, and occasionally plate replications of the dose-response studies. The target endpoint for such studies is typically the LC50, but for some chemicals, there may be multiple doses below a benchmark dose where there is no apparent adverse response relative to control response. We show how an estimation approach can lead to clearly interpretable results about response in the low dose region using data from a high throughput study of 2189 chemicals on yeast. Accurate estimates can be obtained of response for study chemicals by using best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) in a mixed model, and summarized via plots with expected response (assuming no low-dose effect) with confidence intervals for response below the benchmark dose for each chemical, providing an informative summary of response at low doses. We conclude that this approach can provide valuable insights that would be missed if the observational data were only considered through the lens of statistical methods appropriate for experimental studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20877488      PMCID: PMC2939688          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.09-034.Stanek

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  6 in total

1.  Why not routinely use best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) as estimates of cholesterol, per cent fat from kcal and physical activity?

Authors:  E J Stanek; A Well; I Ockene
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons.

Authors:  K J Rothman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Hormesis outperforms threshold model in National Cancer Institute antitumor drug screening database.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese; John W Staudenmayer; Edward J Stanek; George R Hoffmann
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Yeast as a model system for anticancer drug discovery.

Authors:  J A Simon
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.902

5.  A new method for determining allowable daily intakes.

Authors:  K S Crump
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1984-10

6.  Hormesis predicts low-dose responses better than threshold models.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese; Edward J Stanek; Marc A Nascarella; George R Hoffmann
Journal:  Int J Toxicol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.032

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.