Literature DB >> 8961832

Temporal discrimination as a function of marker duration.

T H Rammsayer1, D Leutner.   

Abstract

In a series of three experiments, the effect of marker duration on temporal discrimination was evaluated with empty auditory intervals bounded by markers ranging from 3 to 300 msec or presented as a gap within a continuous tone. As a measure of performance, difference thresholds in relation to a base duration of 50 msec were computed. Performance on temporal discrimination was significantly better with markers ranging from 3 to 150 msec than with markers ranging from 225 to 300 msec or under the gap condition. However, within each range of marker duration (3-150 msec; 225-300 msec or gap) performance did not differ significantly. A fourth experiment provided evidence that the effect of marker duration cannot be explained in terms of marker-induced masking. A good approximation of the relationship between marker duration and temporal discrimination performance in the present experiments is a smooth step function, which can account for 99.3% of the variance of mean discrimination performance. Thus, the findings of the present study point to the conclusion that two different mechanisms are used in the processing of temporal information, depending on the duration of the auditory markers. The tradeoff point for the hypothetical shift from one timing mechanism to the other may be found at a marker duration of approximately 200 msec.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8961832     DOI: 10.3758/bf03207554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  22 in total

1.  Ipsilateral and contralateral masking of duration.

Authors:  H J Kallman; J W Beckstead; P A Cameron
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-01

2.  Temporal gap resolution in listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons; S Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Recognition masking of auditory duration.

Authors:  H J Kallman; S C Hirtle; D Davidson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-07

4.  Preperceptual images, processing time, and perceptual units in auditory perception.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Duration discrimination of empty and filled intervals marked by auditory and visual signals.

Authors:  S Grondin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-09

Review 6.  Perception and estimation of time.

Authors:  P Fraisse
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Tracking a temporal gap in band-limited noise: frequency and level effects.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-05

8.  Temporal gap detection in noise as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Discrimination of time intervals bounded by tone bursts.

Authors:  P L Divenyi; R M Sachs
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-11

10.  A cognitive-neuroscience approach for elucidation of mechanisms underlying temporal information processing.

Authors:  T H Rammsayer
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.292

View more
  5 in total

1.  Taking a long look at isochrony: perceived duration increases with temporal, but not stimulus regularity.

Authors:  Ninja K Horr; Massimiliano Di Luca
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Working Memory for Sequences of Temporal Durations Reveals a Volatile Single-Item Store.

Authors:  Sanjay G Manohar; Masud Husain
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-26

3.  Temporal Context affects interval timing at the perceptual level.

Authors:  Eckart Zimmermann; Guido Marco Cicchini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Increased signal complexity improves the breadth of generalization in auditory perceptual learning.

Authors:  David J Brown; Michael J Proulx
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  The Effect of a Regular Auditory Context on Perceived Interval Duration.

Authors:  Silvia Zeni; Nicholas P Holmes
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.