Literature DB >> 6481300

Bias of phencyclidine discrimination by the schedule of reinforcement.

D E McMillan, G R Wenger.   

Abstract

Pigeons, trained to discriminate phencyclidine from saline under a procedure requiring the bird to track the location of a color, received cumulative doses of phencyclidine, pentobarbital, or d-amphetamine with a variety of schedules of reinforcement in effect (across phases). When the same second-order schedules were used to reinforce responding after either saline or phencyclidine administration, stimulus control by phencyclidine did not depend on the schedule parameter. When different second-order schedules were used that biased responding toward the phencyclidine-correlated key color, pigeons responded on the phencyclidine-correlated key at lower doses of phencyclidine and pentobarbital than when the second-order schedule biased responding toward the saline key color. A similar but less marked effect was obtained with d-amphetamine. Attempts to produce bias by changing reinforcement magnitude (duration of food availability) were less successful. A signal-detection analysis of dose-effect curves for phencyclidine under two of the second-order schedules employed suggested that at low doses of phencyclidine, response bias is a major determinant of responding. As doses were increased, position preferences occurred and response bias decreased; at higher doses both response bias and position preference decreased and discriminability increased. With low doses of pentobarbital, responding again was biased but increasing doses produced position preference with only small increases in discriminability. At low doses of d-amphetamine responding also was biased, but bias did not decrease consistently with dose nor did discriminability increase. These experiments suggest that the schedule of reinforcement can be used to bias responding toward or away from making the drug-correlated response in drug discrimination experiments, and that signal-detection analysis and analysis of responding at a position can be used to separate the discriminability of the drug state from other effects of the drug on responding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6481300      PMCID: PMC1348044          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  Effects of LSD on auditory perception: a signal detection analysis.

Authors:  L A Dykstra; J B Appel
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1974-02-06

2.  Effects of barbiturates and other sedative hypnotics in pigeons trained to discriminate phencyclidine from saline.

Authors:  D E McMillan; G R Wenger
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Signal detection and matching: analyzing choice on concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  A W Logue
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the discriminability of stimulus duration.

Authors:  D McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Conditioned reinforcement in second-order schedules.

Authors:  R T Kelleher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Cannabimimetic activity from CP-47,497, a derivative of 3-phenylcyclohexanol.

Authors:  A Weissman; G M Milne; L S Melvin
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Phencyclidine discrimination in the pigeon using color tracking under second-order schedule.

Authors:  D E McMillan; D A Cole-Fullenwider; W C Hardwick; G R Wenger
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Generalization of the discriminative stimulus properties of phencyclidine to other drugs in the pigeon using color tracking under second order schedules.

Authors:  D E McMillan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.530

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Effects of schedule of reinforcement on a pentobarbital discrimination in rats.

Authors:  S H Snodgrass; D E McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Drug discrimination under a concurrent fixed-interval fixed-interval schedule.

Authors:  D E McMillan; M Li; W C Hardwick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Reinforcement schedule effects in rats trained to discriminate 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) or cocaine.

Authors:  Daniel Kueh; Lisa E Baker
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Drug discrimination in rats under concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  D E McMillan; W C Hardwick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Trends in drug discrimination research analysed with a cross-indexed bibliography, 1984-1987.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; F Rasul; P J Shine
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Nicotine cue in rats: effects of central administration of ganglion-blocking drugs.

Authors:  R Kumar; C Reavill; I P Stolerman
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Limited stimulus generalization between delta 9-THC and diazepam in pigeons and gerbils.

Authors:  T U Järbe; A J Hiltunen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Drug discrimination under a concurrent schedule.

Authors:  S H Snodgrass; D E McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of body weight on discriminative-stimulus control by phencyclidine in the pigeon.

Authors:  B W Massey; D E McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.