Literature DB >> 7365407

On the discriminability of stimulus duration.

D McCarthy, M Davison.   

Abstract

The performance of pigeons trained to detect differences in the duration of stimuli was analysed using a matching model of signal detection. Two white stimuli, S1 and S2, differing in duration, were arranged with equal probability on the center key of a three-key chamber. S1 was systematically varied from 5 seconds to 25 seconds while S2 remained constant at 30 seconds. On completion of the center-key stimulus, a peck on the center key turned on the two red side keys. A left-key response was "correct" when S1 had been in effect on the center key and a right-key response was "correct" on S2 trials. A correct response produced a 3-second magazine light accompanied intermittently by food. Incorrect responses produced 3-second blackouts. Detection performance was measured under two procedures. In the first, the obtained reinforcement ratio was uncontrolled by allowing the number of food reinforcements obtained for correct left- and right-key responses to vary as the stimuli were changed. In the second procedure, the presentation of food reinforcement was controlled by holding the obtained reinforcement ratio constant. Discriminability changed as a function of stimulus differences under both procedures. No such trend was found in response bias.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7365407      PMCID: PMC1332927          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  SIGNAL DETECTION IN FIXED-RATIO SCHEDULES.

Authors:  M RILLING; C MCDIARMID
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Response bias and the discrimination of stimulus duration.

Authors:  D A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Duration discrimination: effects of probability of stimulus presentation.

Authors:  T F Elsmore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Discriminability of fixed-ratio schedules for pigeons: effects of absolute ratio size.

Authors:  S L Hobson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Detection of increments in noise intensity by monkeys.

Authors:  B M Clopton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Number of responses as a stimulus in fixed interval and fixed ratio schedules.

Authors:  M Rilling
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1967-02

10.  Bias functions and operating characteristics of rats discriminating auditory stimuli.

Authors:  A L Hume; R J Irwin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  20 in total

1.  Types of responding in a signal-detection task.

Authors:  B Alsop; R Rowley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reinforcement for errors in a signal-detection procedure.

Authors:  M Davison; D McCarthy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Discriminative performance of the domestic hen in a visual acuity task.

Authors:  L R Demello; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Stimulus and reinforcer relativity in multiple schedules: Local and dimensional effects on sensitivity to reinforcement.

Authors:  K G White; M E Pipe; A P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Component probability and component reinforcer rate as biasers of free-operant detection.

Authors:  M Davison; D McCarthy; C Jensen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Discriminability and sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude in a detection task.

Authors:  Brent Alsop; Melissa Porritt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of schedule of reinforcement on a pentobarbital discrimination in rats.

Authors:  S H Snodgrass; D E McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Human symbolic matching-to-sample performance: Effects of reinforcer and sample-stimulus probabilities.

Authors:  B Alsop; R Rowley; C Fon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The effect of increased response requirements on discriminative performance of the domestic hen in a visual acuity task.

Authors:  L R DeMello; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Ratio versus difference comparators in choice.

Authors:  J Gibbon; S Fairhurst
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.