Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Making sense of rising caesarean section rates.

Literature DB >> 15388590

Making sense of rising caesarean section rates.

Geoffrey M Anderson.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2004 PMID： 15388590 PMCID： PMC518883 DOI： 10.1136/bmj.329.7468.696

Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ ISSN： 0959-8138

× No keyword cloud information.

9 in total

1. Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study.

Authors: J M Belizán; F Althabe; F C Barros; S Alexander
Journal: BMJ Date: 1999-11-27

Review 2. Cesarean section: a worldwide epidemic?

Authors: B L Flamm
Journal: Birth Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 3.689

3. Elective primary cesarean delivery.

Authors: Howard Minkoff; Frank A Chervenak
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-06 Impact factor: 91.245

4. Quick fix culture: the cesarean-section-on-demand debate.

Authors: Michael C Klein
Journal: Birth Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.689

5. Elective cesarean sections gaining acceptance.

Authors: Benjamin Singer
Journal: CMAJ Date: 2004-03-02 Impact factor: 8.262

6. Planned elective cesarean section: a reasonable choice for some women?

Authors: Mary E Hannah
Journal: CMAJ Date: 2004-03-02 Impact factor: 8.262

7. Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous cesarean section.

Authors: J Lomas; M Enkin; G M Anderson; W J Hannah; E Vayda; J Singer
Journal: JAMA Date: 1991-05-01 Impact factor: 56.272

8. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group.

Authors: M E Hannah; W J Hannah; S A Hewson; E D Hodnett; S Saigal; A R Willan
Journal: Lancet Date: 2000-10-21 Impact factor: 79.321

9. Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982.

Authors: G M Anderson; J Lomas
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1984-10-04 Impact factor: 91.245

9 in total

12 in total

1. Declining fertility and the use of cesarean delivery: evidence from a population-based study in Taiwan.

Authors: Ke-Zong M Ma; Edward C Norton; Shoou-Yih D Lee
Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 3.402

2. Making sense of rising caesarean section rates: editorial made no sense of rising rates.

Authors: Christoph C Lees
Journal: BMJ Date: 2004-11-20

3. Making sense of rising caesarean section rates: reducing caesarean section rates should not be the primary objective.

Authors: Michael R Odent
Journal: BMJ Date: 2004-11-20

4. Making sense of rising caesarean section rates: trials and speaking with patients take time.

Authors: Guillaume Gorincour; Sébastien Tassy
Journal: BMJ Date: 2004-11-20

5. Making sense of rising caesarean section rates: caesarean section on demand is obstetric dilemma.

Authors: Venu Jain
Journal: BMJ Date: 2004-11-20

6. Decision-making about mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: development and piloting of two computer-based decision aids.

Authors: Clare L Emmett; Deirdre J Murphy; Roshni R Patel; Tom Fahey; Claire Jones; Ian W Ricketts; Peter Gregor; Maureen Macleod; Alan A Montgomery
Journal: Health Expect Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 3.377

7. Screening for inter-hospital differences in cesarean section rates in low-risk deliveries using administrative data: an initiative to improve the quality of care.

Authors: Willem Aelvoet; Francis Windey; Geert Molenberghs; Hans Verstraelen; Patrick Van Reempts; Jean-Michel Foidart
Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2008-01-04 Impact factor: 2.655