Literature DB >> 422332

Rod sensitivity relative to cone sensitivity in retinitis pigmentosa.

R W Massof, D Finkelstein.   

Abstract

The present study evaluates rod sensitivity relative to cone sensitivity in retinitis pigmentosa patients. From perimetric measures of absolute thresholds to long- and short-wavelength stimuli, we find the results can be characterized in three different ways. For one group of patients it appears that only cone function is present in all parts of the visual field. For another group of patients, despite large losses in absolute sensitivity, rod sensitivity still exceeds cone sensitivity by at least the normal factor, suggesting concomitant rod and cone sensitivity losses. For a third group of patients it appears that central retinal thresholds are determined primarily by cones, midperipheral retinal thresholds determined by a composite of rod and cone function, and far- peripheral thresholds determined predominately by rods. The argument is put forward that the different groups of threshold results represent different disease mechanisms rather than different stages in the progression of a single disease process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 422332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  30 in total

1.  Development of scotopic visual thresholds in retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Amber M Barnaby; Ronald M Hansen; Anne Moskowitz; Anne B Fulton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Rod sensitivity, cone sensitivity, and photoreceptor layer thickness in retinal degenerative diseases.

Authors:  David G Birch; Yuquan Wen; Kelly Locke; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Fundus-controlled two-color dark adaptometry with the Microperimeter MP1.

Authors:  Wadim Bowl; Knut Stieger; Birgit Lorenz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Characterization of Rod Function Phenotypes Across a Range of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Severities and Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits.

Authors:  Oliver J Flynn; Catherine A Cukras; Brett G Jeffrey
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Comparison between MP-1 and Humphrey visual field defects in glaucoma and retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Jennifer H Acton; R Theodore Smith; Jonathan P Greenberg; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Flicker electroretinogram in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  R W Massof; M A Johnson; J S Sunness; C Perry; D Finkelstein
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-03-31       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  A clinical, psychophysical, and electroretinographic survey of patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  A L Lyness; W Ernst; M P Quinlan; G M Clover; G B Arden; R M Carter; A C Bird; J A Parker
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Properties of electroretinographic intensity-response functions in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  R W Massof; L Wu; D Finkelstein; C Perry; S J Starr; M A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-05-30       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Peripheral absolute threshold spectral sensitivity in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  R W Massof; M A Johnson; D Finkelstein
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Two forms of autosomal dominant primary retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  R W Massof; D Finkelstein
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.