Literature DB >> 20697777

Assessing the impact of non-dilating the eye on full-field electroretinogram and standard flash response.

A-M Gagné1, J Lavoie, M-P Lavoie, A Sasseville, M-C Charron, M Hébert.   

Abstract

We investigated the possibility of performing electroretinography (ERG) in non-pharmacologically dilated eyes using brighter flash (time-integrated) luminance. Photopic (N = 26; background 25.5 cd·m(-2), white LED flashes) and scotopic ERG (N = 23, green LED flashes) luminance response functions were obtained simultaneously in a dilated (DE) and non-dilated eye (NDE). In the NDE, photopic V (max) b-wave amplitude was reduced by 14% (P < 0.0001), implicit time prolonged (P < 0.0001), and retinal sensitivity (log K) decreased by 0.38 log units (P < 0.0001) with no effect on a-wave. Using a xenon strobe light (N = 6) to increase flash luminance, V (max) remained lower by about 12% in the NDE (P = 0.02). V (max) with LED and xenon was achieved at 3.9 ± 1.0 cd·s·m(-2) and 3.3 ± 0.81 cd·s·m(-2) in the DE and 10.6 ± 1.2 cd·s·m(-2) and 12.3 ± 1.90 cd·s·m(-2) in the NDE, that is an increase of 0.43 and 0.57 log unit (P < 0.0001), respectively. Increasing background luminance by 0.50 log units (80 cd·m(-2), N = 4) resulted in implicit time normalization but not V (max) amplitude. Rod V (max) was decreased by 7% in NDE (P < 0.05) and sensitivity reduced by 0.40 log units (P < 0.0001), but our data suggest that the luminance may have not been sufficient to reach V (max) in all participants in the NDE and that the sensitivity change may have been due to an inadequate inter-stimulus interval. For the photopic ERG, increasing flash luminance is not sufficient to compensate for the smaller pupil size, whereas for the scotopic ERG, more data are needed to establish proper inter-stimulus interval to perform recordings in a non-pharmacologically dilated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20697777     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-010-9242-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  17 in total

1.  Cone-dominated ERG luminance-response function: the Photopic Hill revisited.

Authors:  Marianne Rufiange; Sophie Rousseau; Olga Dembinska; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The photopic ERG luminance-response function (photopic hill): method of analysis and clinical application.

Authors:  Marianne Rufiange; Justine Dassa; Olga Dembinska; Robert K Koenekoop; John M Little; Robert C Polomeno; Marie Dumont; Sylvain Chemtob; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The photopic hill: a new phenomenon of the light adapted electroretinogram.

Authors:  N Wali; L E Leguire
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Standard for clinical electroretinography (2004 update).

Authors:  Michael F Marmor; Graham E Holder; Mathias W Seeliger; Shuichi Yamamoto
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2008 update).

Authors:  M F Marmor; A B Fulton; G E Holder; Y Miyake; M Brigell; M Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Analysis of the photopic electroretinogram recorded before and after dark adaptation.

Authors:  P Lachapelle
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.882

7.  Age-related changes in the flash electroretinogram and oscillatory potentials in individuals age 75 and older.

Authors:  H Kergoat; M J Kergoat; L Justino
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Properties of electroretinographic intensity-response functions in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  R W Massof; L Wu; D Finkelstein; C Perry; S J Starr; M A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-05-30       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Re-evaluation of tropicamide in the pupillary response test for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Atsuhiko Iijima; Munetaka Haida; Norio Ishikawa; Akinori Ueno; Haruyuki Minamitani; Yukito Shinohara
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.673

View more
  3 in total

1.  ISCEV extended protocol for the stimulus-response series for the dark-adapted full-field ERG b-wave.

Authors:  Mary A Johnson; Brett G Jeffrey; André M V Messias; Anthony G Robson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Electroretinographic modifications induced by agomelatine: a novel avenue to the understanding of the claimed antidepressant effect of the drug?

Authors:  Michele Fornaro; Fabio Bandini; Luca Cestari; Christian Cordano; Carla Ogliastro; Claudio Albano; Domenico De Berardis; Matteo Martino; Andrea Escelsior; Giulio Rocchi; Pantaleo Fornaro; Concetta De Pasquale
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.570

3.  Evaluation of cone function by a handheld non-mydriatic flicker electroretinogram device.

Authors:  Natsuko Nakamura; Kaoru Fujinami; Yoshinobu Mizuno; Toru Noda; Kazushige Tsunoda
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.