Literature DB >> 6466546

Trends in cervical cancer and carcinoma in situ in Great Britain.

G A Cook, G J Draper.   

Abstract

Doubts have frequently been expressed about the effectiveness of the screening programme for cervical cancer in Britain. These doubts have been reinforced as a result of recent increases in mortality from this disease among younger women. In this paper we discuss trends in registration and mortality data, relate these to the level of screening, and conclude that screening may in fact have had a considerable impact on mortality rates. There is good evidence that in some age groups there has been a large increase in the incidence of carcinoma in situ of the cervix; it seems likely that the potential increase in cervical cancer incidence and mortality may have been partially prevented as a result of the screening programme. The extent of this effect cannot be quantified precisely because of uncertainties concerning the natural history of cervical cancer, differences in risk for different cohorts, and the possible effects of other factors. It is likely that incidence rates will continue to change, and it will be necessary to monitor these and the screening programme with some care in order to make the best use of the resources available for cervical cytology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6466546      PMCID: PMC1976785          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1984.185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  18 in total

1.  Screening for cervical cancer: revised policy. The recommendations of the DHSS Committee on Gynaecological Cytology.

Authors:  G J Draper
Journal:  Health Trends       Date:  1982-05

2.  Changing pattern of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia seen in a family planning clinic.

Authors:  P N Bamford; M Barber; J O Beilby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-03-27       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Rising cervical cancer mortality in young New Zealand women.

Authors:  G H Green
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1979-02-14

4.  Mortality from carcinoma of cervix uteri in Britain.

Authors:  J E Macgregor; S Teper
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-10-07       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Abnormal cervical smears: are we in for an epidemic?

Authors:  M R Wolfendale; S King; M M Usherwood
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-08-20

6.  Changing patterns of cervical cancer rates.

Authors:  G J Draper; G A Cook
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-08-20

7.  Invasive carcinoma of the cervix in Queensland. Change in incidence and mortality, 1959-1980.

Authors:  R G Bourne; W D Grove
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1983-02-19       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Increasing mortality from cancer of the cervix in young Australian women.

Authors:  B Armstrong; D Holman
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1981-05-02       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Analysis of trends in cancer mortality in England and Wales during 1951-80 separating changes associated with period of birth and period of death.

Authors:  C Osmond; M J Gardner; E D Acheson
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-04-03

10.  Neoplasia and dysplasia of the cervix uteri and contraception: a possible protective effect of the diaphragm.

Authors:  N H Wright; M P Vessey; B Kenward; K McPherson; R Doll
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour.

Authors:  F Fylan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Abnormal cervical smear test results: old dilemmas and new directions.

Authors:  C Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Report of a National Workshop on Screening for Cancer of the Cervix.

Authors:  A B Miller; G Anderson; J Brisson; J Laidlaw; N Le Pitre; P Malcolmson; P Mirwaldt; G Stuart; W Sullivan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Cervical cancer--changing perspectives.

Authors:  P Lenehan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Twenty years' screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Great Britain, 1964-84: further evidence for its ineffectiveness.

Authors:  M F Murphy; M J Campbell; P O Goldblatt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Cervical screening in general practice.

Authors:  E E Pollock; A T Thompson
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-11

7.  An evaluation of screening policies for cervical cancer in England and Wales using a computer simulation model.

Authors:  D M Parkin; S M Moss
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Cervical brush biopsy specimens suitable for DNA and oncoprotein analysis using flow cytometry.

Authors:  J Elias-Jones; P Hendy-Ibbs; H Cox; G I Evan; J V Watson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Preliminary results of a district call scheme for cervical screening organised in general practice.

Authors:  C M Havelock; J Webb; J Queenborough
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-11-26

10.  Incidence of cervical cancer after several negative smear results by age 50: prospective observational study.

Authors:  Matejka Rebolj; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Elsebeth Lynge; Caspar Looman; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Rob Boer; Dik Habbema
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.