Literature DB >> 3746177

An evaluation of screening policies for cervical cancer in England and Wales using a computer simulation model.

D M Parkin, S M Moss.   

Abstract

Several screening policies have been recommended for implementation in England and Wales in the last 20 years, although no evidence as to their relative effectiveness or efficiency has been provided. Using a computer simulation model, the outcomes expected from those policies had they been implemented over a 30 year period (1961-90) have been examined. The original policies based on five-yearly testing of women aged over 35 appear to be the most cost-effective, and extension of screening to younger age groups leads to loss of efficiency. Attempts to use non-screening health care contacts in order to take cervical smears (eg, during pregnancy, family planning, at gynaecology clinics) produce few advantages and considerably complicate the establishment of regular testing for the individual. The achievement of higher attendance rates is as important to the outcome of screening as concentration on more intensive or complex policies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3746177      PMCID: PMC1052509          DOI: 10.1136/jech.40.2.143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  21 in total

1.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of cytologic screening for cervical cancer. 3. Cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  L Dickinson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Using age, period and cohort models to estimate future mortality rates.

Authors:  C Osmond
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  ACS report on the cancer-related health checkup.

Authors:  D Eddy
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Optimising the age, number of tests, and test interval for cervical screening in Canada.

Authors:  Y Shun-Zhang; A B Miller; G J Sherman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Cervical cytology screening in two Yorkshire areas: results of testing.

Authors:  D M Parkin; K Leach; P Cobb; A D Clayden
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.427

6.  Effect of a mass screening program on the risk of cervical cancer.

Authors:  M Hakama; U Räsänen-Virtanen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Cervical cancer in younger women.

Authors:  F J Andrews; J J Linehan; D H Melcher
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-10-07       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Costs of detecting and treating cancer of the uterine cervix in North-East Scotland in 1971.

Authors:  J B Thorn; E M Russell; J E Macgregor; K Swanson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-03-22       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Quality control in cytological screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  O A Husain
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1976 May-Jun

10.  Ages and frequencies for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  E G Knox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  How can we develop a cost-effective quality cervical screening programme?

Authors:  Sue Wilson; Helen Lester
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  ARMADA--a computer model of the impact of environmental factors on health.

Authors:  Martin Utley; Steve Gallivan; Jane Biddulph; Mark McCarthy; Jake Ferguson
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2003-08

Review 3.  Calibration methods used in cancer simulation models and suggested reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Amy B Knudsen; Chung Yin Kong; Pamela M McMahon; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Cervical cytology and colposcopy in clinics for sexually transmitted diseases--when are they appropriate?

Authors:  J D Wilson
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1996-12

5.  Withdrawing low risk women from cervical screening programmes: mathematical modelling study.

Authors:  C Sherlaw-Johnson; S Gallivan; D Jenkins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-06

Review 6.  Cost-effective policies for cervical cancer screening. An international review.

Authors:  M C Fahs; S B Plichta; J S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Twenty years' screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Great Britain, 1964-84: further evidence for its ineffectiveness.

Authors:  M F Murphy; M J Campbell; P O Goldblatt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  The audit of cervical cytology screening programmes: discussion paper.

Authors:  H E Ewart
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 18.000

9.  Natural history of cervical neoplasia: consistent results obtained by an identification technique.

Authors:  L Gustafsson; H O Adami
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Cytologic screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Sweden evaluated by identification and simulation.

Authors:  L Gustafsson; H O Adami
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.