Literature DB >> 698042

Neoplasia and dysplasia of the cervix uteri and contraception: a possible protective effect of the diaphragm.

N H Wright, M P Vessey, B Kenward, K McPherson, R Doll.   

Abstract

Among the 17,032 women included in the Oxford-Family Planning Association contraceptive study, 65 developed biopsy proven cervical neoplasia (including dysplasia) prior to 1 September 1977. The incidence rate in diaphragm users (0.17 per 1000 woman-years of observation) was much lower than the rates in oral contraceptive users or intrauterine device users (0.95 and 0.87 respectively). This difference could not be explained in terms of confounding variables, nor was it attributable to a lower frequency of cervical smearing among diaphragm users within the clinics. Detailed information about age at first intercourse, numbers of sexual partners and the frequency of cervical smearing outside the clinics was obtained from 52 of the women with cervical neoplasia and 139 matched controls. Diaphragm users were less likely to have had coitus at an early age and had had materially fewer sexual partners than users of the other two methods of contraception. After adjusting for the effects of these variables, however, the risk of cervical neoplasia in diaphragm users was still only about one quarter that in the users of the other methods. Patterns of smearing varied little between users of the various contraceptive methods. Smoking emerged as a major "risk factor" for cervical neoplasia in this study. This probably implies that the smoking habit reflects some important aspect of sexual behaviour relevant to the production of the disease that we have been unable to measure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 698042      PMCID: PMC2009729          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1978.198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  7 in total

1.  A long-term follow-up study of women using different methods of contraception--an interim report.

Authors:  M Vessey; R Doll; R Peto; B Johnson; P Wiggins
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  1976-10

2.  Oral contraceptives and cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  J G Boyce; T Lu; J H Nelson; R G Fruchter
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1977-08-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Smoking and cancer of the uterine cervix: hypothesis.

Authors:  W Winkelstein
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  A case control study into the possible effects of birth control pills on pre-clinical carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  A J Worth; D A Boyes
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw       Date:  1972-08

5.  Prevalence rates of uterine cervical carcinoma in situ for women using the diaphragm or contraceptive oral steroids.

Authors:  M R Melamed; L G Koss; B J Flehinger; R P Kelisky; H Dubrow
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1969-07-26

6.  Cervical carcinoma and the pill.

Authors:  H J Collette; G Linthorst; F de Waard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-02-25       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A STUDY OF THE AETIOLOGY OF CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX UTERI.

Authors:  J T BOYD; R DOLL
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of female controlled barrier methods in preventing sexually transmitted infections and HIV: current evidence and future research directions.

Authors:  A M Minnis; N S Padian
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Contraception.

Authors:  A A Kubba; J Guillebaud
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-12-06

3.  Cervical caps or diaphragms: answering your patients' questions.

Authors:  M J Donlevy
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Cigarette smoking and cancer of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  E R Greenberg; M Vessey; K McPherson; D Yeates
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Trends in cervical cancer and carcinoma in situ in Great Britain.

Authors:  G A Cook; G J Draper
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Smoking and cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  W Winkelstein
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Squamous and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a comparison using routine data.

Authors:  P B Silcocks; H Thornton-Jones; M Murphy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  A case-control study to investigate the association between exposure to benzene and deaths from leukaemia in oil refinery workers.

Authors:  L Rushton; M R Alderson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Characteristics of women with dysplasia or carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri.

Authors:  R W Harris; L A Brinton; R H Cowdell; D C Skegg; P G Smith; M P Vessey; R Doll
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Oral contraceptives and cervical cancer--further findings from the Oxford Family Planning Association contraceptive study.

Authors:  K T Zondervan; L M Carpenter; R Painter; M P Vessey
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.