Literature DB >> 638951

Mammographic parenchymal patterns as a risk indicator for prevalent and incident cancer.

P M Krook, T Carlile, W Bush, M H Hall.   

Abstract

Different mammographic parenchymal patterns have been found to be associated with significantly different rates for the development of breast cancer in a screening program of self-referred women. These differences are qualitatively similar but of lesser magnitude than those in previous reports by Wolfe which were based on symptomatic women who had had a previous negative mammogram. In addition, this report indicates a small difference in the rate of breast cancer at first mammographic examination, using the same parenchymal classifications. These findings, coupled with other risk factors, may permit the concentration of mammographic screening on a smaller segment of the population at risk, thus improving the benefit to risk ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 638951     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197803)41:3<1093::aid-cncr2820410343>3.0.co;2-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  6 in total

1.  Mammographic density does not differ between unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women at low-to-average risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Gretchen L Gierach; Jennifer T Loud; Catherine K Chow; Sheila A Prindiville; Jennifer Eng-Wong; Peter W Soballe; Claudia Giambartolomei; Phuong L Mai; Claudia E Galbo; Kathryn Nichols; Kathleen A Calzone; Celine Vachon; Mitchell H Gail; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  A clinicopathologic correlation of mammographic parenchymal patterns and associated risk factors for human mammary carcinoma.

Authors:  K I Bland; J G Kuhns; J B Buchanan; P A Dwyer; L F Heuser; C A O'Connor; L A Gray; H C Polk
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The association of histological and radiological indicators of breast cancer risk.

Authors:  S Urbanski; H M Jensen; G Cooke; D McFarlane; P Shannon; V Kruikov; N F Boyd
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 4.  Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Bias and the association of mammographic parenchymal patterns with breast cancer.

Authors:  N F Boyd; B O'Sullivan; J E Campbell; E Fishell; I Simor; G Cooke; T Germanson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Mammographic signs as risk factors for breast cancer.

Authors:  N F Boyd; B O'Sullivan; J E Campbell; E Fishell; I Simor; G Cooke; T Germanson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.