Literature DB >> 7059469

Mammographic signs as risk factors for breast cancer.

N F Boyd, B O'Sullivan, J E Campbell, E Fishell, I Simor, G Cooke, T Germanson.   

Abstract

We have carried out a case-control study to examine the relationship between mammographic signs and breast cancer. The mammographic signs assessed were prominent ducts and dysplasia. The cases were a group of 183 women with histologically verified unilateral breast cancer. The controls were a group of women attending a screening centre. Cases and controls were individually age-matched. Mammograms from the non-cancerous breast of the cases were randomly assembled with those of the controls and classified by 3 radiologists without knowledge of which films were from cases and which from controls. Mammographic dysplasia was found to be strongly associated with breast cancer, particularly in women aged less than 50. Prominent ducts were only weakly associated with breast cancer. Multivariate analysis showed that the association between dysplasia and breast cancer could not be explained on the basis of other risk factors for breast cancer, and that classification of dysplasia discriminated more strongly between cases and controls than did classification of Wolfe's mammographic patterns. These results show that mammograms contain information about risk of breast cancer. Mammographic dysplasia is strongly associated with breast cancer, is present in a substantial proportion of patients with the disease, and may offer opportunities for prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7059469      PMCID: PMC2010892          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1982.32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  22 in total

1.  Mammographic parenchymal pattern and the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  E Wilkinson; C Clopton; J Gordonson; R Green; A Hill; M C Pike
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial.

Authors:  S Shapiro
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  A genetic study of human breast cancer.

Authors:  D E Anderson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Are breast patterns a risk index for breast cancer? A reappraisal.

Authors:  L Mendell; M Rosenbloom; A Naimark
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer.

Authors:  J N Wolfe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Risk of developing breast cancer determined by mammography.

Authors:  J N Wolfe
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1977

7.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and the prevalence of breast cancer.

Authors:  R G Peyster; L Kalisher; P Cole
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern.

Authors:  J N Wolfe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The use of an impeded androgen--danazol--in the management of benign breast disorders.

Authors:  R H Asch; R B Greenblatt
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1977-01-15       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Age at first birth and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  B MacMahon; P Cole; T M Lin; C R Lowe; A P Mirra; B Ravnihar; E J Salber; V G Valaoras; S Yuasa
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 9.408

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention.

Authors:  N F Boyd; L J Martin; J Stone; C Greenberg; S Minkin; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Dietary fat and breast cancer risk: the feasibility of a clinical trial of breast cancer prevention.

Authors:  N F Boyd; M Cousins; G Lockwood; D Tritchler
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.880

3.  Quantification of breast density with spectral mammography based on a scanned multi-slit photon-counting detector: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Association between mammographic density and age-related lobular involution of the breast.

Authors:  Karthik Ghosh; Lynn C Hartmann; Carol Reynolds; Daniel W Visscher; Kathleen R Brandt; Robert A Vierkant; Christopher G Scott; Derek C Radisky; Thomas A Sellers; V Shane Pankratz; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The myth of the 50-50 breast.

Authors:  M J Yaffe; J M Boone; N Packard; O Alonzo-Proulx; S Y Huang; C L Peressotti; A Al-Mayah; K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Reproducibility of BI-RADS breast density measures among community radiologists: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mary C Spayne; Charlotte C Gard; Joan Skelly; Diana L Miglioretti; Pamela M Vacek; Berta M Geller
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Radiographic parenchymal patterns in Japanese females as a risk factor for breast carcinoma.

Authors:  O Kojima; T Majima; Y Uehara; E Ikeda; T Ahn; Y Fujita; Y Tamura; S Majima
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Independent association of lobular involution and mammographic breast density with breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Karthik Ghosh; Celine M Vachon; V Shane Pankratz; Robert A Vierkant; Stephanie S Anderson; Kathleen R Brandt; Daniel W Visscher; Carol Reynolds; Marlene H Frost; Lynn C Hartmann
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Age as a confounding factor in the association of mammographic dysplasia and estrogen receptor concentration in breast cancer.

Authors:  N F Boyd; E Fishell; K Tonkin; B G Mobbs
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Breast percent density: estimation on digital mammograms and central tomosynthesis projections.

Authors:  Predrag R Bakic; Ann-Katherine Carton; Despina Kontos; Cuiping Zhang; Andrea B Troxel; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.