Literature DB >> 7059468

Bias and the association of mammographic parenchymal patterns with breast cancer.

N F Boyd, B O'Sullivan, J E Campbell, E Fishell, I Simor, G Cooke, T Germanson.   

Abstract

We have carried out a case-control study to evaluate the association between Wolfe's mammographic patterns and the risk of breast cancer, and to examine the influence of control selection and the radiologist who read the films upon the results obtained. Mammograms of the non-cancerous breast of 183 women with unilateral breast cancer were compared with mammograms from two age-matched control groups: a group of asymptomatic women attending a screening centre, and a group of symptomatic women referred for the diagnostic evaluation of suspected breast disease. Films were arranged in random sequence and independently classified by 3 radiologists. A strong and statistically significant association was found between mammographic dysplasia and breast cancer when controls from the screening centre were compared to cases, but not when cases were compared to women referred for the diagnostic evaluation of breast disease. This result appears to arise in part because of an association between symptoms of benign breast disease and mammographic dysplasia, and suggests that some previous negative studies of the association of mammographic patterns with breast cancer may have arisen from the inclusion of symptomatic subjects as controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7059468      PMCID: PMC2010905          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1982.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  16 in total

1.  Assessing inter-rater reliability for rating scales: resolving some basic issues.

Authors:  D V Cicchetti
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 9.319

2.  Mammographic patterns and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  S Hainline; L Myers; R McLelland; J Newell; S Grufferman; W Shingleton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Are breast patterns a risk index for breast cancer? A reappraisal.

Authors:  L Mendell; M Rosenbloom; A Naimark
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns as a risk indicator for prevalent and incident cancer.

Authors:  P M Krook; T Carlile; W Bush; M H Hall
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer.

Authors:  J N Wolfe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and the prevalence of breast cancer.

Authors:  R G Peyster; L Kalisher; P Cole
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Patterns of breast parenchyma on mammography.

Authors:  D F Rideout; P Y Poon
Journal:  J Can Assoc Radiol       Date:  1977-12

8.  Breast cancer mammography patterns.

Authors:  R L Egan; R C Mosteller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns as risk indicators for incident cancer in a screening program: an extended analysis.

Authors:  P M Krook
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern.

Authors:  J N Wolfe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  5 in total

1.  Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: masking bias or causality?

Authors:  C H van Gils; J D Otten; A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Radiographic parenchymal patterns in Japanese females as a risk factor for breast carcinoma.

Authors:  O Kojima; T Majima; Y Uehara; E Ikeda; T Ahn; Y Fujita; Y Tamura; S Majima
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Evaluation of mammographic density patterns: reproducibility and concordance among scales.

Authors:  Macarena Garrido-Estepa; Francisco Ruiz-Perales; Josefa Miranda; Nieves Ascunce; Isabel González-Román; Carmen Sánchez-Contador; Carmen Santamariña; Pilar Moreo; Carmen Vidal; Mercé Peris; María P Moreno; Jose A Váquez-Carrete; Francisca Collado-García; Francisco Casanova; María Ederra; Dolores Salas; Marina Pollán
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Mammographic densities as a criterion for entry to a clinical trial of breast cancer prevention.

Authors:  N F Boyd; E Fishell; R Jong; J C MacDonald; R K Sparrow; I S Simor; V Kriukov; G Lockwood; D Tritchler
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Mammographic signs as risk factors for breast cancer.

Authors:  N F Boyd; B O'Sullivan; J E Campbell; E Fishell; I Simor; G Cooke; T Germanson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.