Literature DB >> 2849977

The association of histological and radiological indicators of breast cancer risk.

S Urbanski1, H M Jensen, G Cooke, D McFarlane, P Shannon, V Kruikov, N F Boyd.   

Abstract

Previous work has shown that extensive mammographic dysplasia in women aged less than 50 was strongly associated with breast cancer but that the radiological appearance of ductal prominence was not associated with risk. In the present paper we examine the association between these mammographic signs in the breast and histological patterns in the terminal ductal lobular unit (TDLU), the region of the breast where breast cancer is believed to originate. Surgical biopsies from a consecutive series of women aged less than 50 were reviewed and classified according to the histopathology of the epithelium in the TDLU. Mammograms from the same subjects were independently classified according to the extent of the radiological signs of dysplasia and ductal prominence. Degree of histopathology and the extent of mammographic dysplasia were associated and atypia of the ductal type was found more frequently in patients with extensive dysplasia. However, the strength and statistical significance of the association varied according to the radiologist who classified the mammograms. No association was found between degree of histopathology and ductal prominence. These results add to the evidence that extensive mammographic dysplasia in women aged less than 50 is a risk factor for breast cancer. They do not indicate that the radiological signs of dysplasia are caused by histological changes in the TDLU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2849977      PMCID: PMC2246805          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1988.244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  15 in total

1.  An atlas of subgross pathology of the human breast with special reference to possible precancerous lesions.

Authors:  S R Wellings; H M Jensen; R G Marcum
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Relationship between mammographic and histologic features of breast tissue in women with benign biopsies.

Authors:  R A Bright; A S Morrison; J Brisson; N A Burstein; N S Sadowsky; D B Kopans; J E Meyer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Re: "The relationship between Wolfe's classification of mammograms, accepted breast cancer risk factors, and the incidence of breast cancer".

Authors:  F de Waard; J J Rombach
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Association of atypical characteristics of benign breast lesions with subsequent risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  M M Black; T H Barclay; S J Cutler; B F Hankey; A J Asire
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Breast cancer prediction and the Wolfe classification of mammograms.

Authors:  T Carlile; K J Kopecky; D J Thompson; J R Whitehead; F I Gilbert; A J Present; B A Threatt; P Krook; E Hadaway
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns as a risk indicator for prevalent and incident cancer.

Authors:  P M Krook; T Carlile; W Bush; M H Hall
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern.

Authors:  J N Wolfe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The use of an impeded androgen--danazol--in the management of benign breast disorders.

Authors:  R H Asch; R B Greenblatt
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1977-01-15       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  The histopathology of mammographic patterns.

Authors:  E R Fisher; A Palekar; W S Kim; C Redmond
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease.

Authors:  W D Dupont; D L Page
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: general principles and pathological relevance with special emphasis on the role of matrix metalloproteinases.

Authors:  Paola Nisticò; Mina J Bissell; Derek C Radisky
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Hormone-responsive 3D multicellular culture model of human breast tissue.

Authors:  Xiuli Wang; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Fibrosis and cancer: do myofibroblasts come also from epithelial cells via EMT?

Authors:  Derek C Radisky; Paraic A Kenny; Mina J Bissell
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 4.429

4.  Tissue composition of mammographically dense and non-dense breast tissue.

Authors:  Karthik Ghosh; Kathleen R Brandt; Carol Reynolds; Christopher G Scott; V S Pankratz; Darren L Riehle; Wilma L Lingle; Tonye Odogwu; Derek C Radisky; Daniel W Visscher; James N Ingle; Lynn C Hartmann; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 5.  Matrix metalloproteinase-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer.

Authors:  Evette S Radisky; Derek C Radisky
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 6.  Breast cancer: early diagnosis of precursor lesions and clinically inapparent carcinoma by fine needle aspiration.

Authors:  J A Linsk
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1991

7.  The origins of breast cancer associated with mammographic density: a testable biological hypothesis.

Authors:  Norman Boyd; Hal Berman; Jie Zhu; Lisa J Martin; Martin J Yaffe; Sofia Chavez; Greg Stanisz; Greg Hislop; Anna M Chiarelli; Salomon Minkin; Andrew D Paterson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Mammographic density and matrix metalloproteinases in breast tissue.

Authors:  Jana S Steude; Gertraud Maskarinec; Eva Erber; Martijn Verheus; Brenda Y Hernandez; Jeffrey Killeen; J Mark Cline
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2009-12-10

9.  Mammographic density does not correlate with Ki-67 expression or cytomorphology in benign breast cells obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration from women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Qamar J Khan; Bruce F Kimler; Anne P O'Dea; Carola M Zalles; Priyanka Sharma; Carol J Fabian
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Mammographic density is related to stroma and stromal proteoglycan expression.

Authors:  Salem Alowami; Sandra Troup; Sahar Al-Haddad; Iain Kirkpatrick; Peter H Watson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 6.466

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.