Literature DB >> 6365958

Comparison of two commercially available test methods with conventional coagulase tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

D L Jungkind, N J Torhan, K E Corman, J M Bondi.   

Abstract

The API STAPHase (Analytab Products, Inc., Plainview, N.Y.) and SeroSTAT Staph (Scott Laboratories, Fiskville, R.I.) tests were compared to the conventional tube coagulase test and a slide coagulase test by using fresh isolates of members of the family Micrococcaceae. The 4-h, 24-h, and combined readings of the tube coagulase test detected 94.5, 99.5 and 100%, respectively, of 219 Staphylococcus aureus isolates. The API STAPHase, SeroSTAT Staph, and slide coagulase tests detected 95.9, 95.4 and 95.9% of the isolates of S. aureus, respectively. There were no false-positive results with any of the systems when tested with 103 strains of members of the family Micrococcaceae other than S. aureus. We concluded that the STAPHase and SeroSTAT Staph tests were equal in accuracy to the slide coagulase and 4-h tube coagulase tests and were suitable for use in the clinical microbiology laboratory. However, SeroSTAT Staph gave faster results than the API STAPHase, and the test was easier to perform. Also, the false-negative rate was high enough with the STAPHase, SeroSTAT Staph, and the slide coagulase tests that all negative reactions should be confirmed with a tube test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6365958      PMCID: PMC271015          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.19.2.191-193.1984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  8 in total

1.  The use of a lyophilized human plasma standardized for blood coagulation factors in the coagulase and fibrinolytic tests.

Authors:  F J TURNER; B S SCHWARTZ
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1958-12

2.  Evidence for two forms of staphylococcal coagulase.

Authors:  E S DUTHIE
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1954-06

3.  Microtube coagulase test for detection of coagulase-positive staphylococci.

Authors:  J Goldstein; J W Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of the latex slide agglutination test for identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  B A Myrick; P D Ellner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of three test procedures for identification of Staphylococcus aureus from clinical sources.

Authors:  J Y Zarzour; E A Belle
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Identification of coagulase-positive Staphylococcus intermedius and Staphylococcus hyicus subsp. hyicus isolates from veterinary clinical specimens.

Authors:  W E Phillips; W E Kloos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of a commercial latex agglutination test for identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  G V Doern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Rapid and reliable identification of Staphylococcus aureus by a latex agglutination test.

Authors:  L Essers; K Radebold
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Coagulase testing compared with commercial kits for routinely identifying Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  A S Rossney; L F English; C T Keane
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Evaluation of six different agglutination methods for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  A Orsi; A Bartoloni; L Martelli; M G Colao
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Evaluation of new agglutination test for identification of oxacillin-susceptible and oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Y Tveten
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparative evaluation of identification systems for testing methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S M Smith; C Berezny
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Staphylococcus aureus strains which are not identified by rapid agglutination methods are of capsular serotype 5.

Authors:  J M Fournier; A Boutonnier; A Bouvet
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of RapiDEC Staph for identification of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus.

Authors:  W M Janda; K Ristow; D Novak
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of various rapid agglutination methods for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J S Baker; M A Bormann; D H Boudreau
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of three commercial agglutination tests for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  D R Pennell; J A Rott-Petri; T A Kurzynski
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Reliability of latex agglutination tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to oxacillin.

Authors:  A Punsalang; P C Migneault; F S Nolte
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.948

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.