Literature DB >> 3638308

Comparative evaluation of identification systems for testing methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

S M Smith, C Berezny.   

Abstract

Several commercial systems are available to distinguish between Staphylococcus aureus and the coagulase-negative species of the Micrococcaceae family. Four latex agglutination systems (Accu-Staph, SeroSTAT, Staphaurex, and Staphylatex) and two hemagglutination systems (Hemastaph and Staphyloslide) were compared for their performance in the rapid identification of 232 isolates of staphylococci, including 114 of methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Accu-Staph, Staphaurex, and Staphyloslide correctly identified 100% of the methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates; Hemastaph and Staphylatex, 99.1%; and SeroSTAT, 94.7%. Most reactions were easy to interpret, although 15% of the SeroSTAT reactions were weak. Autoagglutination occurred only with isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci. False-positive reactions were rare and occurred only with systems which did not detect autoagglutination. Five of these six systems appear to be adequate for the rapid identification of S. aureus, including methicillin-resistant isolates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3638308      PMCID: PMC268869          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.24.2.173-176.1986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  15 in total

1.  In vitro comparison of A-56619, A-56620, amifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, norfloxacin, and ofloxacin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S M Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Sensitized sheep red cells as a reactant for Staphylococcus aureus protein A. Methodology and epidemiology with special reference to weakly reacting methicillin-resistant strains.

Authors:  S Winblad; C Ericson
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1973-02

3.  Pseudocoagulase activity of staphylococci.

Authors:  Z Wegrzynowicz; P B Heczko; J Jeljaszewicz; M Neugebauer; G Pulverer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Study of the staphylococcal affinity to fibrinogen by passive hemagglutination: a tool for the Staphylococcus aureus identification.

Authors:  J P Flandrois; G Carret
Journal:  Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A       Date:  1981-12

5.  Comparison of coagulase, deoxyribonuclease (DNase), and heat-stable nuclease tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  R E Menzies
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Evaluation of the latex slide agglutination test for identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  B A Myrick; P D Ellner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of three test procedures for identification of Staphylococcus aureus from clinical sources.

Authors:  J Y Zarzour; E A Belle
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Direct identification of Staphylococcus aureus in blood culture fluid with a commercial latex agglutination test.

Authors:  G V Doern; L I Robbie
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Evaluation of a commercial latex agglutination test for identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  G V Doern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Rapid and reliable identification of Staphylococcus aureus by a latex agglutination test.

Authors:  L Essers; K Radebold
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of a direct identification method for Staphylococcus aureus from blood culture broth.

Authors:  A C Hamoudi; M M Hribar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Staphaurex reappraised: role of protein A in false positive results and recommendations for use.

Authors:  A J Mifsud; S C Parker
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Evaluation of new agglutination test for identification of oxacillin-susceptible and oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Y Tveten
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Use of commercial particle agglutination systems for the rapid identification of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J Adams; R Van Enk
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Problems with rapid agglutination methods for identification of Staphylococcus aureus when Staphylococcus saprophyticus is being tested.

Authors:  D B Gregson; D E Low; M Skulnick; A E Simor
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Latex agglutination for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus recovered from selective media.

Authors:  A R Wanger; D G Moore; M T LaRocco
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Staphylococcus aureus strains which are not identified by rapid agglutination methods are of capsular serotype 5.

Authors:  J M Fournier; A Boutonnier; A Bouvet
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Reliability of latex agglutination tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to oxacillin.

Authors:  A Punsalang; P C Migneault; F S Nolte
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.