Literature DB >> 2754004

Staphylococcus aureus strains which are not identified by rapid agglutination methods are of capsular serotype 5.

J M Fournier1, A Boutonnier, A Bouvet.   

Abstract

A total of 183 recent Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates were tested with three commercially available rapid agglutination methods. The capsular polysaccharide type and resistance to oxacillin of these isolates were also determined. Seven isolates were not identified correctly by agglutination methods. All isolates not identified by the rapid methods were of capsular serotype 5, and of these isolates, six were resistant to oxacillin. The results suggest that these agglutination kits can be improved by the use of antibodies reactive with S. aureus capsular polysaccharide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2754004      PMCID: PMC267559          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1372-1374.1989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  21 in total

1.  Encapsulation and capsular types in isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from different sources and relationship to phage types.

Authors:  D Sompolinsky; Z Samra; W W Karakawa; W F Vann; R Schneerson; Z Malik
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Method for the serological typing of the capsular polysaccharides of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  W W Karakawa; J M Fournier; W F Vann; R Arbeit; R S Schneerson; J B Robbins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of rapid identification assays for Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; C Kogos; C V Sanders; R L Marier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of the latex slide agglutination test for identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  B A Myrick; P D Ellner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Predominance of two newly described capsular polysaccharide types among clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  R D Arbeit; W W Karakawa; W F Vann; J B Robbins
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 2.803

6.  Comparison of two commercially available test methods with conventional coagulase tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  D L Jungkind; N J Torhan; K E Corman; J M Bondi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of various rapid agglutination methods for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J S Baker; M A Bormann; D H Boudreau
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of a commercial latex agglutination test for identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  G V Doern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Rapid and reliable identification of Staphylococcus aureus by a latex agglutination test.

Authors:  L Essers; K Radebold
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of three commercial agglutination tests for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  D R Pennell; J A Rott-Petri; T A Kurzynski
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Use of enzyme tests in characterization and identification of aerobic and facultatively anaerobic gram-positive cocci.

Authors:  S Bascomb; M Manafi
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  A Shared noncapsular antigen is responsible for false-positive reactions by Staphylococcus epidermidis in commercial agglutination tests for Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J E Blake; M A Metcalfe
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of five agglutination tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M Wilkerson; S McAllister; J M Miller; B J Heiter; P P Bourbeau
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a continuing infection control challenge.

Authors:  J M Boyce
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Use of commercial particle agglutination systems for the rapid identification of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J Adams; R Van Enk
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  International multicenter evaluation of latex agglutination tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  A van Griethuysen; M Bes; J Etienne; R Zbinden; J Kluytmans
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Multiresistant strains are as susceptible to photodynamic inactivation as their naïve counterparts: protoporphyrin IX-mediated photoinactivation reveals differences between methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Authors:  Mariusz Grinholc; Aleksandra Rapacka-Zdonczyk; Bartosz Rybak; Florian Szabados; Krzysztof P Bielawski
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Dissemination of two methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones exhibiting negative staphylase reactions in intensive care units.

Authors:  P R Hsueh; L J Teng; P C Yang; H J Pan; Y C Chen; L H Wang; S W Ho; K T Luh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of three commercial rapid agglutination test kits for identification of coagulase positive staphylococci from foods and animals.

Authors:  I J Holme; O Rosef; S Ewald
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.695

10.  Latex agglutination-negative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus recovered from neonates: epidemiologic features and comparison of typing methods.

Authors:  A R Wanger; S L Morris; C Ericsson; K V Singh; M T LaRocco
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.