Literature DB >> 27699563

Randomized Comparison of Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Skin Closure After Open Abdominal Surgery: a Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kazuhiro Imamura1, Kensuke Adachi2,3, Ritsuko Sasaki1, Satoko Monma1, Sadaaki Shioiri4, Yasuji Seyama5, Masaru Miura6, Yoshihiko Morikawa6, Tetsuji Kaneko6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incisional surgical site infection (SSI) is an extremely common complication following open abdominal surgery and imposes a considerable treatment and cost burden.
METHOD: We conducted a multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial at three Tokyo Metropolitan medical institutions. We enrolled adult patients who underwent either an elective or an emergency open laparotomy. Eligible patients were allocated preoperatively to undergo wound closure with either subcuticular sutures or staples. A central Web-based randomization tool was used to assign participants randomly by a permuted block sequence with a 1:1 allocation ratio and a block size of 4 before mass closure to each group. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a superficial SSI within 30 days after surgery in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. This trial was registered with UMIN-CTR as UMIN 000004836 ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr ).
RESULTS: Between September 1, 2010 and August 31, 2015, 401 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either group. One hundred and ninety-nine patients were allocated to the subcuticular suture and 202 patients to the staple groups (hereafter the "suture" and "staple" group, respectively). Three hundred and ninety-nine were eligible for the primary endpoint. Superficial SSIs occurred in 25 of 198 suture patients and in 27 of 201 staple patients. Overall, the rate of superficial SSIs did not differ significantly between the suture and staple groups.
CONCLUSION: Subcuticular sutures did not increase the occurrence of superficial SSIs following open laparotomies mainly consisting of clean-contaminated surgical procedures. The applicability of the wound closure material and method is likely to depend on individual circumstances of the patient and surgical procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Open abdominal surgery; Staple; Subcuticular suture; Surgical site infection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27699563     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3283-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  29 in total

1.  The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs.

Authors:  K B Kirkland; J P Briggs; S L Trivette; W E Wilkinson; D J Sexton
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 2.  Cutaneous wound healing.

Authors:  A J Singer; R A Clark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-09-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Prognostic modelling with logistic regression analysis: a comparison of selection and estimation methods in small data sets.

Authors:  E W Steyerberg; M J Eijkemans; F E Harrell; J D Habbema
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Improving the assessment of (in)patients' satisfaction with hospital care.

Authors:  A A Hendriks; M R Vrielink; E M Smets; S Q van Es; J C De Haes
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Suzanne L Basha; Meredith L Rochon; Joanne N Quiñones; Kara M Coassolo; Orion A Rust; John C Smulian
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Surgical research or comic opera: questions, but few answers.

Authors:  R Horton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Effectiveness of triclosan-coated PDS Plus versus uncoated PDS II sutures for prevention of surgical site infection after abdominal wall closure: the randomised controlled PROUD trial.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Phillip Knebel; Meinhard Kieser; Philipp Schüler; Tobias S Schiergens; Vladimir Atanassov; Jens Neudecker; Erwin Stein; Henryk Thielemann; Reiner Kunz; Moritz von Frankenberg; Utz Schernikau; Jörg Bunse; Boris Jansen-Winkeln; Lars I Partecke; Gerald Prechtl; Julius Pochhammer; Ralf Bouchard; René Hodina; K Tobias E Beckurts; Lothar Leißner; Hans-Peter Lemmens; Friedrich Kallinowski; Oliver Thomusch; Daniel Seehofer; Thomas Simon; Alexander Hyhlik-Dürr; Christoph M Seiler; Thilo Hackert; Christoph Reissfelder; René Hennig; Colette Doerr-Harim; Christina Klose; Alexis Ulrich; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Cutaneous closure after cardiac operations: a controlled, randomized, prospective comparison of intradermal versus staple closures.

Authors:  R G Johnson; W E Cohn; R L Thurer; J R McCarthy; C A Sirois; R M Weintraub
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Risk factor of surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Teiichi Sugiura; Katsuhiko Uesaka; Norio Ohmagari; Hideyuki Kanemoto; Takashi Mizuno
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Imputation methods for missing outcome data in meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Ian R White; Angela M Wood
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

View more
  8 in total

1.  Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Closed Abdominal Incisions: A Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Cameron I Wells; Chathura B B Ratnayake; Jenni Perrin; Sanjay Pandanaboyana
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Superficial Surgical Site Infection Following the Use of Intracutaneous Sutures Versus Staples.

Authors:  Elisabeth Maurer; Alexander Reuss; Katja Maschuw; Behnaz Aminossadati; Thomas Neubert; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Detlef K Bartsch
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Wound Complication Rates After Staples or Suture for Midline Vertical Skin Closure in Obese Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Lindsay M Kuroki; Mary M Mullen; L Stewart Massad; Ningying Wu; Jingxia Liu; David G Mutch; Matthew A Powell; Andrea R Hagemann; Premal H Thaker; Carolyn K McCourt; Akiva P Novetsky
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Effect of stapled versus layered skin closure on surgical site occurrences after abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Bryana Baginski; Regan Van Metre; Quinn Elliott; Jeremy A Warren; J Alex Ewing; William S Cobb; Alfredo M Carbonell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Review of stentless, tubeless, apposed renal (STAR) transplant wound management programme.

Authors:  Hui Wen Melissa Tay; Pei Yi Sim; Yong Ai Teo; Lata Rahman; Ho Yee Tiong
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.

Authors:  Saori Goto; Takashi Sakamoto; Riki Ganeko; Koya Hida; Toshi A Furukawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-09

7.  Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Juntao Feng; Xiaoli Jiang; Zhifu Zhi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Delphi Consensus on Intraoperative Technical/Surgical Aspects to Prevent Surgical Site Infection after Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Jaime Ruiz-Tovar; Marja A Boermeester; Liliana Bordeianou; George J Chang; Emre Gorgun; Christoph Justinger; Elise H Lawson; David J Leaper; Najjia N Mahmoud; Christopher Mantyh; Michael F McGee; Valentine Nfonsam; Ines Rubio-Perez; Elizabeth C Wick; Traci L Hedrick
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 6.532

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.