Literature DB >> 6233710

Stress analysis of the lumbar disc-body unit in compression. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element study.

S A Shirazi-Adl, S C Shrivastava, A M Ahmed.   

Abstract

It has been argued that a clarification of the mechanical causes of low-back pain requires a knowledge of the states of stress and strain throughout the lumbo-sacral spine. Since a purely experimental approach cannot provide this information, analytical model studies, to supplement measurements, are called for. In the present study, a general three-dimensional finite element program has been developed and applied for the analysis of the lumbar L2-3 disc-body unit. The analysis accounts for both the material and the geometric nonlinearities and is based on a representation of the annulus as a composite of collagenous fibers embedded in a matrix of ground substance. The geometry of the model analyzed is based on in vitro measurements. The validity of the model and the analysis procedure has been established by a comparison of those predictions that are also amenable to direct measurements, eg, the response of the disc-body unit to compressive load in terms of axial displacement, disc bulge, end-plate bulge, and intradiscal pressure. The states of stress and strain have then been computed in the cancellous bone, cortical shell, and the subchondral endplate of the intervertebral body and in the annulus fibers and ground substance of the disc when the unit is subjected to a compressive load. The results indicate that for a normal disc with an incompressible nucleus, the most vulnerable elements under compressive load are the cancellous bone and the end-plate adjacent to the nucleus space. On the other hand, for a degenerated disc, simulated in an extreme fashion by assuming it to be void of the nucleus, the analysis predicts the annulus bulk material to be also susceptible to failure. The annulus fibers do not appear to be vulnerable to rupture when the disc-body unit is subjected to pure compressive force.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6233710     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198403000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  55 in total

1.  The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Regional variations in the cellular matrix of the annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Sabina B Bruehlmann; Jerome B Rattner; John R Matyas; Neil A Duncan
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Sensitivity studies of pediatric material properties on juvenile lumbar spine responses using finite element analysis.

Authors:  D Davidson Jebaseelan; C Jebaraj; Narayan Yoganandan; S Rajasekaran; Rishi M Kanna
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Analysis of biomechanical changes after removal of instrumentation in lumbar arthrodesis by finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Heoung-Jae Chun; Seong-Hwan Moon; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Hak-Sun Kim; Jin-Oh Park; Eun-Su Moon; Joon-Seok Sohn; Hwan-Mo Lee
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  A history of spine biomechanics. Focus on 20th century progress.

Authors:  T R Oxland
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Validation of a clinical finite element model of the human lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  Yabo Guan; Narayan Yoganandan; Jiangyue Zhang; Frank A Pintar; Joesph F Cusick; Christopher E Wolfla; Dennis J Maiman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-07-08       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Biomechanical comparison of fusionless growth modulation corrective techniques in pediatric scoliosis.

Authors:  Mark Driscoll; Carl-Eric Aubin; Alain Moreau; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Locations of bone tissue at high risk of initial failure during compressive loading of the human vertebral body.

Authors:  Senthil K Eswaran; Atul Gupta; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 10.  Mechanical design criteria for intervertebral disc tissue engineering.

Authors:  Nandan L Nerurkar; Dawn M Elliott; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.