Literature DB >> 12955610

Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis.

Anne Polikeit1, Stephen J Ferguson, Lutz P Nolte, Tracy E Orr.   

Abstract

Intervertebral cages in the lumbar spine have been an advancement in spinal fusion to relieve low back pain. Even though initial stability is accepted as a requirement for fusion, there are other factors. The load transfer and its effect on the tissues adjacent to the cage may also play an essential role, which is not easily detectable with experimental tests. In this study the effects of an intervertebral cage insertion on a lumbar functional spinal unit were investigated using finite element analyses. The influences of cage material, cancellous bone density and spinal loading for the stresses in a functional spinal unit were evaluated. Three-dimensional (3D) finite element models of L2-L3 were developed for this purpose. An anterior approach for a monobloc, box-shaped cage was modelled. Models with cage were compared to the corresponding intact ones. The results showed that inserting a cage increased the maximum von Mises stress and changed the load transfer in the adjacent structures. Varying the cage material or the loading conditions had a much smaller influence than varying the cancellous bone density. The denser the cancellous bone, the more the stress was concentrated underneath the cage, while the remaining regions were unloaded. This study showed that the density of the underlying cancellous bone is a more important factor for the biomechanical behaviour of a motion segment stabilized with a cage, and its eventual clinical success, than the cage material or the applied load. Inserting an intervertebral cage markedly changed the load transfer. The altered stress distribution may trigger bone remodelling and explain damage of the underlying vertebrae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12955610      PMCID: PMC3467788          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-002-0505-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  40 in total

1.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages: an independent review of 71 cases.

Authors:  S Agazzi; A Reverdin; D May
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Cages: designs and concepts.

Authors:  T Steffen; A Tsantrizos; I Fruth; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Biomechanics of stand-alone cages and cages in combination with posterior fixation: a literature review.

Authors:  T R Oxland; T Lund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Influence of PLIF cage size on lumbar spine stability.

Authors:  J C Goh; H K Wong; A Thambyah; C S Yu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Stabilizing effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages before and after cyclic loading.

Authors:  A Kettler; H J Wilke; R Dietl; M Krammer; C Lumenta; L Claes
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate.

Authors:  D R Carter; W C Hayes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Deformation of the vertebral end-plate under axial loading of the spine.

Authors:  P Brinckmann; W Frobin; E Hierholzer; M Horst
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The effect of nucleotomy on lumbar spine mechanics in compression and shear loading.

Authors:  H Frei; T R Oxland; G C Rathonyi; L P Nolte
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  A comparative biomechanical investigation of anterior lumbar interbody cages: central and bilateral approaches.

Authors:  T R Oxland; Z Hoffer; T Nydegger; G C Rathonyi; L P Nolte
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Four-year follow-up results of lumbar spine arthrodesis using the Bagby and Kuslich lumbar fusion cage.

Authors:  S D Kuslich; G Danielson; J D Dowdle; J Sherman; B Fredrickson; H Yuan; S L Griffith
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  56 in total

1.  The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System® (TFAS®): loading as compared to a rigid posterior instrumentation system.

Authors:  Simon G Sjovold; Qingan Zhu; Anton Bowden; Chad R Larson; Peter M de Bakker; Marta L Villarraga; Jorge A Ochoa; David M Rosler; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  A systematic review of the use of expandable cages in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Benjamin D Elder; Sheng-Fu Lo; Thomas A Kosztowski; C Rory Goodwin; Ioan A Lina; John E Locke; Timothy F Witham
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Biomechanical comparison of fusionless growth modulation corrective techniques in pediatric scoliosis.

Authors:  Mark Driscoll; Carl-Eric Aubin; Alain Moreau; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Scientific basis for the treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  R C Mulholland
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Finite element modeling of the growth plate in a detailed spine model.

Authors:  Pierre-Luc Sylvestre; Isabelle Villemure; Carl-Eric Aubin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis: potential impact of dynamic stabilization based on imaging analysis.

Authors:  Thomas W Lawhorne; Federico P Girardi; Curtis A Mina; Iaonnis Pappou; Frank P Cammisa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Biomechanical comparison of two different concepts for stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Philipp Schleicher; R Gerlach; B Schär; C M J Cain; W Achatz; R Pflugmacher; N P Haas; F Kandziora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The influence of intrinsic disc degeneration of the adjacent segments on its stress distribution after one-level lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Heoung-Jae Chun; Choon-Ki Lee; Bong-Soon Chang; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with various posterior stabilization systems.

Authors:  Wei Fan; Li-Xin Guo; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.