Literature DB >> 22484661

Sensitivity studies of pediatric material properties on juvenile lumbar spine responses using finite element analysis.

D Davidson Jebaseelan1, C Jebaraj, Narayan Yoganandan, S Rajasekaran, Rishi M Kanna.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to determine the sensitivity of material properties of the juvenile spine to its external and internal responses using a finite element model under compression, and flexion-extension bending moments. The methodology included exercising the 8-year-old juvenile lumbar spine using parametric procedures. The model included the vertebral centrum, growth plates, laminae, pedicles, transverse processes and spinous processes; disc annulus and nucleus; and various ligaments. The sensitivity analysis was conducted by varying the modulus of elasticity for various components. The first simulation was done using mean material properties. Additional simulations were done for each component corresponding to low and high material property variations. External displacement/rotation and internal stress-strain responses were determined under compression and flexion-extension bending. Results indicated that, under compression, disc properties were more sensitive than bone properties, implying an elevated role of the disc under this mode. Under flexion-extension moments, ligament properties were more dominant than the other components, suggesting that various ligaments of the juvenile spine play a key role in modulating bending behaviors. Changes in the growth plate stress associated with ligament properties explained the importance of the growth plate in the pediatric spine with potential implications in progressive deformities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22484661     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-012-0896-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  23 in total

1.  Statistical factorial analysis on the material property sensitivity of the mechanical responses of the C4-C6 under compression, anterior and posterior shear.

Authors:  H W Ng; E C Teo; V S Lee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Pediatric spine injuries.

Authors:  Luiz R Vialle; Emiliano Vialle
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Novel model to analyze the effect of a large compressive follower pre-load on range of motions in a lumbar spine.

Authors:  Susan M Renner; Raghu N Natarajan; Avinash G Patwardhan; Robert M Havey; Leonard I Voronov; Bev Y Guo; Gunnar B J Andersson; Howard S An
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study.

Authors:  Sasidhar Vadapalli; Koichi Sairyo; Vijay K Goel; Matt Robon; Ashok Biyani; Ashutosh Khandha; Nabil A Ebraheim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Guilhem Denozière; David N Ku
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Immature sheep spines are more flexible than mature spines: an in vitro biomechanical study.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Clarke; Richard C Appleyard; Lynne E Bilston
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Can variations in intervertebral disc height affect the mechanical function of the disc?

Authors:  Y M Lu; W C Hutton; V M Gharpuray
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Normal values of the vertebral body and intervertebral disk index during growth.

Authors:  M E Brandner
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1970-11

9.  Patient-specific spine models. Part 1: Finite element analysis of the lumbar intervertebral disc--a material sensitivity study.

Authors:  M J Fagan; S Julian; D J Siddall; A M Mohsen
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.617

10.  Statistical factorial analysis on the poroelastic material properties sensitivity of the lumbar intervertebral disc under compression, flexion and axial rotation.

Authors:  Andrea Malandrino; Josep A Planell; Damien Lacroix
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  3 in total

1.  Biomechanical Study of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Devices Using Finite Element Modeling.

Authors:  Narayan Yoganandan; Yuvaraj Purushothaman; Hoon Choi; Jamie Baisden; Deepak Rajasekaran; Anjishnu Banerjee; Davidson Jebaseelan; Shekar Kurpad
Journal:  J Eng Sci Med Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-02-22

Review 2.  Low back pain in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of conservative interventions.

Authors:  Zoe A Michaleff; Steven J Kamper; Christopher G Maher; Roni Evans; Carolyn Broderick; Nicholas Henschke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of strategies for adjacent segment disease after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: is the extension of pedicle screws necessary?

Authors:  Ziyang Liang; Jianchao Cui; Jiarui Zhang; Jiahui He; Jingjing Tang; Hui Ren; Linqiang Ye; Xiaobing Jiang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.