Literature DB >> 20440570

Analysis of biomechanical changes after removal of instrumentation in lumbar arthrodesis by finite element analysis.

Ho-Joong Kim1, Heoung-Jae Chun, Seong-Hwan Moon, Kyoung-Tak Kang, Hak-Sun Kim, Jin-Oh Park, Eun-Su Moon, Joon-Seok Sohn, Hwan-Mo Lee.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the change in biomechanical milieu following removal of pedicle screws in instrumented single level lumbar arthrodesis. Using a validated finite element (FE) model of the intact lumbar spine (L2-5), two scenarios of L3-4 lumbar fusion were simulated: posterolateral fusion (PLF) at L3-4 using pedicle screws (PLF with pedicle screws; WiP) and L3-4 lumbar posterolateral fusion state after removal of pedicle screws (PLF without pedicle screws; WoP). The WiP model had greater range of motion (ROM) at each adjacent segment than the WoP model. This phenomenon became pronounced at the proximal adjacent segment under flexion moment. Similarly, removal of pedicle screws (the WoP model) relieved the maximal von Mises stress at adjacent segments under 4 moments compared to the WiP model. This study demonstrated that removal of pedicle screws could decrease stiffness of fusion segments, which would reduce the disk stress of adjacent segments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20440570     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-010-0621-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  30 in total

1.  Stress analysis of the disc adjacent to interbody fusion in lumbar spine.

Authors:  C S Chen; C K Cheng; C L Liu; W H Lo
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 2.  Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature.

Authors:  Paul Park; Hugh J Garton; Vishal C Gala; Julian T Hoff; John E McGillicuddy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Validation of a clinical finite element model of the human lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  Yabo Guan; Narayan Yoganandan; Jiangyue Zhang; Frank A Pintar; Joesph F Cusick; Christopher E Wolfla; Dennis J Maiman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-07-08       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Finite element analysis of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: threaded cylindrical cage and pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Young Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Kinematics of the lumbar spine in elderly subjects with decreased bone mineral density.

Authors:  Heather Ting Ma; James F Griffith; Zhengyi Yang; Anthony Wai Leung Kwok; Ping Chung Leung; Raymond Y W Lee
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Comparison of mechanical motion profiles following instrumented fusion and non-instrumented fusion at the L4-5 segment.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Seong-Hwan Moon; Heoung-Jae Chun; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Hak-Sun Kim; Eun-Su Moon; Jin-Oh Park; Byung-Yoon Hwang; Hwan-Mo Lee
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 0.825

7.  Lateral mass fusion. A prospective study of a consecutive series with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  R K Jackson; D A Boston; A J Edge
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability.

Authors:  S Etebar; D W Cahill
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion.

Authors:  M N Kumar; A Baklanov; D Chopin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Christopher M Bono; Casey K Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  [Is routine implant removal after trauma surgery sensible?].

Authors:  C Krettek; C Müller; R Meller; M Jagodzinski; F Hildebrand; R Gaulke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  The benefits of elective spinal implant removal: a retrospective study of 137 patients.

Authors:  Thorsten Jentzsch; Vinicius Gomes de Lima; Burkhardt Seifert; Kai Sprengel; Clément M L Werner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Prediction of complications and fusion outcomes of fused lumbar spine with or without fixation system under whole-body vibration.

Authors:  Qing-Dong Wang; Li-Xin Guo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Biomechanical analysis of fusion segment rigidity upon stress at both the fusion and adjacent segments: a comparison between unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jang-Woo Kim; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  The Mismatch Between Bony Endplates and Grafted Bone Increases Screw Loosening Risk for OLIF Patients With ALSR Fixation Biomechanically.

Authors:  Jing-Chi Li; Tian-Hang Xie; Zhuang Zhang; Zhe-Tao Song; Yue-Ming Song; Jian-Cheng Zeng
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-08

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of three surgical scenarios of posterior lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis.

Authors:  Zhitao Xiao; Liya Wang; He Gong; Dong Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Biomechanical Comparison of Spinal Fusion Methods Using Interspinous Process Compressor and Pedicle Screw Fixation System Based on Finite Element Method.

Authors:  Jisoo Choi; Sohee Kim; Dong-Ah Shin
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-02-29

8.  Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test.

Authors:  Mingzhi Song; Kebin Sun; Zhonghai Li; Junwei Zong; Xiliang Tian; Kai Ma; Shouyu Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: stand-alone interbody cage versus interbody cage with pedicle screw fixation -- a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Kyung-Chul Choi; Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Sang-Ho Lee; Yeong Hyeon Kim; Sung Jae Lee; Chun-Kun Park
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Treatment of unstable thoracolumbar fractures through short segment pedicle screw fixation techniques using pedicle fixation at the level of the fracture: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Changqing Li; Yue Zhou; Hongwei Wang; Jun Liu; Liangbi Xiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.