Literature DB >> 6228138

An analysis for paternal-age effect in Ohio's Down syndrome births, 1970-1980.

G O Roecker, C A Huether.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze Down syndrome (DS) births during 1970-1980 in the State of Ohio for a paternal-age effect independent of maternal age. Birth certificates and chromosome analysis records were used to ascertain 1,244 white DS births, which by capture-recapture methodology were estimated to comprise two-thirds of all white DS births in Ohio for this period. The control data consisted of 1,667,210 white live births in Ohio during the same period. One method of statistical analysis was a case-control comparison, which for each single-year maternal age compares the mean paternal age for controls with each observed DS paternal age. No statistically significant paternal-age effect was found in nine of the 11 years. For two of the years, and for all years combined, the DS fathers were significantly younger than the fathers of controls. When the data were subdivided according to ascertainment, one subpopulation--those DS individuals obtained from birth certificates alone--also showed a statistically significant negative paternal-age effect. The Mantel-Haenszel test was also applied to these data. Assuming no paternal-age effect, a lower rate of DS births than expected was found at paternal ages greater than or equal to 40, but not at greater than or equal to 45, greater than or equal to 50, or greater than or equal to 55. These same methods were used to test for a maternal-age effect. In each of the 11 years and over all 11 years combined, a strong and statistically significant positive maternal-age effect was detected.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6228138      PMCID: PMC1685965     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  14 in total

1.  On data and methods in investigations on parental-age effects. Comments on a paper by J. D. Erickson.

Authors:  J Stene; E Stene
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 1.670

2.  Reexamination of paternal age effect in Down's syndrome.

Authors:  E Matsunaga; A Tonomura; H Oishi; Y Kikuchi
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1978-02-16       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Down syndrome, paternal age, maternal age and birth order.

Authors:  J D Erickson
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 1.670

4.  A search for evidence for a paternal age effect independent of a maternal age effect in birth certificate reports of Down's syndrome in New York state.

Authors:  R R Regal; P K Cross; S H Lamson; E B Hook
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Down syndrome associated with father's age in Norway.

Authors:  J D Erickson; T O Bjerkedal
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Paternal age and Down syndrome in British Columbia.

Authors:  E B Hook; P K Cross; S H Lamson; R R Regal; P A Baird; S H Uh
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  On the inadequacy of quinquennial data for analyzing the paternal age effect on Down's syndrome rates.

Authors:  S H Lamson; P K Cross; E B Hook; R Regal
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Origin of the additional chromosome in Down's syndrome: a study of 20 families.

Authors:  D F Roberts; M H Callow
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Paternal age and Down syndrome.

Authors:  J D Erickson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Paternal age effect in Down's syndrome.

Authors:  J Stene; G Fischer; E Stene; M Mikkelsen; E Petersen
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.670

View more
  8 in total

1.  Paternal age and trisomy among spontaneous abortions.

Authors:  M Hatch; J Kline; B Levin; M Hutzler; D Warburton
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Crossover Interference, Crossover Maturation, and Human Aneuploidy.

Authors:  Shunxin Wang; Yanlei Liu; Yongliang Shang; Binyuan Zhai; Xiao Yang; Nancy Kleckner; Liangran Zhang
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  An unexpected finding: younger fathers have a higher risk for offspring with chromosomal aneuploidies.

Authors:  Bernhard Steiner; Rahim Masood; Kaspar Rufibach; Dunja Niedrist; Oliver Kundert; Mariluce Riegel; Albert Schinzel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Age-Dependent Alterations in Meiotic Recombination Cause Chromosome Segregation Errors in Spermatocytes.

Authors:  Maciej J Zelazowski; Maria Sandoval; Lakshmi Paniker; Holly M Hamilton; Jiaying Han; Mikalah A Gribbell; Rhea Kang; Francesca Cole
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Issues in analysis of data on paternal age and 47,+21: implications for genetic counseling for Down syndrome.

Authors:  E B Hook
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  An aetiological study of 290 XXY males, with special reference to the role of paternal age.

Authors:  A D Carothers; S Collyer; R De Mey; I Johnstone
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  The effect of age on the frequency of sperm chromosomal abnormalities in normal men.

Authors:  R H Martin; A W Rademaker
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  The relationship between paternal age, sex ratios, and aneuploidy frequencies in human sperm, as assessed by multicolor FISH.

Authors:  R H Martin; E Spriggs; E Ko; A W Rademaker
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.025

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.