Literature DB >> 21437618

The reproducibility of binocular pattern reversal visual evoked potentials: a single subject design.

Tessa B Mellow1, Alki Liasis, Ruth Lyons, Dorothy A Thompson.   

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the within-participant variability over time of both amplitude and peak latency measures of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials (pVEPs). As a large number of factors are known to contribute to the variability of the pVEPs (such as fixation instability and drowsiness), testing was conducted in controlled conditions with two co-operative participants. PVEPs were recorded during 24 sessions, over an eight-week period using the same equipment and recording settings. The participants viewed a plasma monitor binocularly from a distance of 1 meter. High contrast (97%), black and white checks of side subtense 50', 25', and 12.5' pattern reversed 3/s in a 28 degree test field. The different sized checks were presented in a pseudo-random order. Three runs, each of 100 trials, were acquired to each stimulus from an active electrode placed at Oz referred to aFz. The amplitude of N80-P100 and the latency of P100 were measured. P100 amplitude and latency were stable across sessions and did not depend upon the order of check size presentation. As expected, variation in amplitude was greater than peak latency. The coefficients of variation for different check sizes and participants were 9-14% for pVEP amplitude, but only 1-2% for P100 latency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21437618     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-011-9267-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  29 in total

1.  Variability on serial testing of pattern reversal visual evoked potential latencies from full-field, half-field and foveal stimulation in control subjects.

Authors:  S R Hammond; S MacCallum; C Yiannikas; J C Walsh; J G McLeod
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-04

2.  P100 amplitude variability of the pattern visual evoked potential.

Authors:  T J Shors; J P Ary; K J Eriksen; K W Wright
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-07

3.  The pattern-evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways.

Authors:  A M Halliday; E Halliday; A Kriss; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  [Reproducibility of the pattern electroretinogram].

Authors:  T Otto; M Bach
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Age-related changes in the latency of the visual evoked potential: influence of check size.

Authors:  S Sokol; A Moskowitz; V L Towle
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-05

6.  Do visual evoked potentials studies reveal amblyopic abnormalities not readily apparent in psychophysical tests?

Authors:  D M Levi
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Serial evoked potential studies in patients with definite multiple sclerosis. Clinical relevance.

Authors:  M J Aminoff; S L Davis; H S Panitch
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1984-11

8.  Voluntary alteration of pattern visual evoked responses.

Authors:  R K Morgan; B Nugent; J M Harrison; P S O'Connor
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 9.  Visually evoked potentials: theory, techniques and clinical applications.

Authors:  S Sokol
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

10.  Optic nerve atrophy and retinal nerve fibre layer thinning following optic neuritis: evidence that axonal loss is a substrate of MRI-detected atrophy.

Authors:  S Anand Trip; Patricio G Schlottmann; Stephen J Jones; Wai-Yung Li; David F Garway-Heath; Alan J Thompson; Gordon T Plant; David H Miller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Spontaneous ocular and neurologic deficits in transgenic mouse models of multiple sclerosis and noninvasive investigative modalities: a review.

Authors:  Archana A Gupta; Di Ding; Richard K Lee; Robert B Levy; Sanjoy K Bhattacharya
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Sport-related concussion and sensory function in young adults.

Authors:  Robert D Moore; Steven P Broglio; Charles H Hillman
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Serial, Visually-Evoked Potentials for the Assessment of Visual Function in Patients with Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Mostafa M Haredy; Alki Liasis; Amani Davis; Kathleen Koesarie; Valeria Fu; Joseph E Losee; Jesse A Goldstein; Ken K Nischal
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Developmental Effects on Pattern Visual Evoked Potentials Characterized by Principal Component Analysis.

Authors:  Carlyn Patterson Gentile; Nabin R Joshi; Kenneth J Ciuffreda; Kristy B Arbogast; Christina Master; Geoffrey K Aguirre
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  The clinical value of the multi-channel PVEP and PERG in the diagnosis and management of the patient with pituitary adenoma: a case report.

Authors:  Ewelina Lachowicz; Wojciech Lubiński
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.